Science learning as a rich, complementary interplay between symbolic, embodied, and emotional aspects of learning

This discussion paper explores the complementary contributions of symbolic, embodied, and emotional ways of knowing in science. Drawing on scholarship from the history of science, neuroscience and education, we note that whilst symbolic forms of knowing have long been privileged, contemporary research points to the integral contributions of physical and emotional experiences to produce a rich, conceptual understanding. Next, we introduce our complementary contributions model of science learning in which we assert that symbolic, embodied and emotional forms of knowing intersect and overlap. Here we acknowledge that non-symbolic ways of knowing can be difficult to articulate and evaluate, and subsequently may be seen to be of secondary importance. Fortunately, many educators do seek to promote embodied and emotional ways of learning and we examine one such museum-based project – Future Inventors – and reflect on its activities through the lens of the complementary contributions model. Further, we review evaluation data from the project to identify design features which appear key in fostering a multi-modal approach to science learning. We end by arguing that if we do not support embodied and emotional forms of knowing alongside the symbolic, we will fail in our efforts to support enduring and generative forms of science understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science Education Part B
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2025.2453952
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science learning as a rich, complementary interplay between symbolic, embodied, and emotional aspects of learning

Melissa Glackin, Heather King, Lulú Healy, Richard Brock et al.
International Journal of Science Education Part B
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Science learning as a rich, complementary interplay between symbolic, embodied, and emotional aspects of learning

Melissa Glackin, Heather King, Lulú Healy, Richard Brock, Maria Xanthoudaki
article en

Abstract

This discussion paper explores the complementary contributions of symbolic, embodied, and emotional ways of knowing in science. Drawing on scholarship from the history of science, neuroscience and education, we note that whilst symbolic forms of knowing have long been privileged, contemporary research points to the integral contributions of physical and emotional experiences to produce a rich, conceptual understanding. Next, we introduce our complementary contributions model of science learning in which we assert that symbolic, embodied and emotional forms of knowing intersect and overlap. Here we acknowledge that non-symbolic ways of knowing can be difficult to articulate and evaluate, and subsequently may be seen to be of secondary importance. Fortunately, many educators do seek to promote embodied and emotional ways of learning and we examine one such museum-based project – Future Inventors – and reflect on its activities through the lens of the complementary contributions model. Further, we review evaluation data from the project to identify design features which appear key in fostering a multi-modal approach to science learning. We end by arguing that if we do not support embodied and emotional forms of knowing alongside the symbolic, we will fail in our efforts to support enduring and generative forms of science understanding.

International Journal of Science Education Part BVol. 15(4)
King's College London (GB), King's College School (GB), Museo Nazionale della Scienza e della Tecnologia Leonardo da Vinci (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.