Predicting bulk density in Brazilian soils for carbon stocks calculation: a comparative study of multiple linear regression and Random Forest models using continuous and categorical variables

Soil bulk density (ρb) is vital for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) and nutrient stocks, as well as for modeling soil processes. Although ρb can be measured using traditional methods, these are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Consequently, there is a growing interest in developing pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to predict ρb based on more easily measured soil properties. The vast Brazilian territory, with different climates and biomes, presents a challenge for development of national-scale PTFs, particularly for ρb. In this study, a comprehensive dataset was compiled from various sources to develop ρb PTFs across Brazil. The dataset includes particle size distribution (PSD), SOC, ρb, sampling depth, soil order, land use, and geographic coordinates, allowing for the incorporation of additional numerical and categorical variables. Rigorous data preprocessing ensured quality and reliability. PTFs were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) models. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error, bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination. Both MLR and RF models accurately predicted ρb, with log-transformed PSD and SOC emerging as key predictors. The RF model slightly outperformed the MLR model (RMSE = 0.12 vs. 0.13 g cm−3) on the test dataset, underscoring the importance of environmental and categorical variables in predicting ρb. The developed PTFs, along with other PTFs for Brazil, were applied to estimate SOC stocks across different biomes and land uses. Best estimations were obtained with the RF model, with an R2 of 0.97, emphasizing the value of categorical variables in improving SOC stock estimations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Soil.
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-025-00035-6
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting bulk density in Brazilian soils for carbon stocks calculation: a comparative study of multiple linear regression and Random Forest models using continuous and categorical variables

Fabiano José Perina, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, Carlos Manoel Pedro Vaz, Rafael Galbieri et al.
7 citations
Discover Soil.
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
5.59
article

Predicting bulk density in Brazilian soils for carbon stocks calculation: a comparative study of multiple linear regression and Random Forest models using continuous and categorical variables

Fabiano José Perina, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, Carlos Manoel Pedro Vaz, Rafael Galbieri, Ladislau Martin‐Neto, Wharley Pereira dos Santos, Javier Tomasella, Jackson Adriano Albuquerque, F. de S. Costa, Adriano Anselmi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Soil bulk density (ρb) is vital for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) and nutrient stocks, as well as for modeling soil processes. Although ρb can be measured using traditional methods, these are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Consequently, there is a growing interest in developing pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to predict ρb based on more easily measured soil properties. The vast Brazilian territory, with different climates and biomes, presents a challenge for development of national-scale PTFs, particularly for ρb. In this study, a comprehensive dataset was compiled from various sources to develop ρb PTFs across Brazil. The dataset includes particle size distribution (PSD), SOC, ρb, sampling depth, soil order, land use, and geographic coordinates, allowing for the incorporation of additional numerical and categorical variables. Rigorous data preprocessing ensured quality and reliability. PTFs were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) models. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error, bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination. Both MLR and RF models accurately predicted ρb, with log-transformed PSD and SOC emerging as key predictors. The RF model slightly outperformed the MLR model (RMSE = 0.12 vs. 0.13 g cm−3) on the test dataset, underscoring the importance of environmental and categorical variables in predicting ρb. The developed PTFs, along with other PTFs for Brazil, were applied to estimate SOC stocks across different biomes and land uses. Best estimations were obtained with the RF model, with an R2 of 0.97, emphasizing the value of categorical variables in improving SOC stock estimations.

Discover Soil.Vol. 2(1)
Universidade Federal do Acre (BR), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (BR), Institute of Crop Science (JP), Fundação de Tecnologia do Estado do Acre (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Bayer Corporation, Fundação Arthur Bernardes
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.