The Impact of Audit Findings and Recommendation Follow-Up on Public Service Quality: An Empirical Investigation

Public services, traditionally provided by government agencies, present challenges in measuring their quality. As a result, research on public service quality remains relatively limited. This study seeks to examine both the direct and indirect effects of audit findings and the follow-up of audit recommendations on public service quality. The analysis covers 480 regency and city governments over the period 2021–2022, employing panel data regression, ordinal logistic regression, and the Sobel test. The findings reveal that audit findings negatively affect public service quality, while the follow-up on audit recommendations has a positive impact. These effects are observed both directly and indirectly, mediated by the quality of financial statements. This underscores the critical role of sound financial management in delivering high-quality public services. The results suggest that government agencies should not only strive for unqualified audit opinions but also prioritize the thorough follow-up of audit findings and recommendations. Doing so enhances both the quality of financial reporting and the overall delivery of public services. Keywords: Public Service, Opinion, Audit Findings, Audit Recommendations Follow-up

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2024.v19.i02.p06
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Audit Findings and Recommendation Follow-Up on Public Service Quality: An Empirical Investigation

Harti Budi Yanti, Barlian Izza Ardlillah
2 citations
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis
Public Policy and Administration Research
1.71
article

The Impact of Audit Findings and Recommendation Follow-Up on Public Service Quality: An Empirical Investigation

Harti Budi Yanti, Barlian Izza Ardlillah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Public services, traditionally provided by government agencies, present challenges in measuring their quality. As a result, research on public service quality remains relatively limited. This study seeks to examine both the direct and indirect effects of audit findings and the follow-up of audit recommendations on public service quality. The analysis covers 480 regency and city governments over the period 2021–2022, employing panel data regression, ordinal logistic regression, and the Sobel test. The findings reveal that audit findings negatively affect public service quality, while the follow-up on audit recommendations has a positive impact. These effects are observed both directly and indirectly, mediated by the quality of financial statements. This underscores the critical role of sound financial management in delivering high-quality public services. The results suggest that government agencies should not only strive for unqualified audit opinions but also prioritize the thorough follow-up of audit findings and recommendations. Doing so enhances both the quality of financial reporting and the overall delivery of public services. Keywords: Public Service, Opinion, Audit Findings, Audit Recommendations Follow-up

Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan BisnisVol. 19(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Public Policy and Administration Research
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.