A Universal Framework for Near-Real-Time Detection of Vegetation Anomalies from Landsat Data

Vegetation anomalies are frequently occurring and may greatly affect ecological functions. Many near-real-time (NRT) detection methods have been developed to detect these anomalies in a timely manner whenever a new satellite observation is available. However, the undisturbed vegetation conditions captured by these methods are only applicable to a particular pixel or vegetation type, resulting in a lack of universality. Also, most methods that use single characteristic parameter may ignore the multi-spectral expression of vegetation anomalies. In this study, we developed a universal framework to simultaneously detect various vegetation anomalies in NRT from Landsat observations. Firstly, Landsat surface reflectance data from the Benchmark Land Multisite Analysis and Intercomparison of Products (BELMANIP) sites were selected as a reference vegetation dataset to calculate the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized burn ratio (NBR), which describe vegetation conditions from the perspectives of greenness and moisture, respectively. After the elimination of cloud-contaminated pixels, the high-quality NDVI and NBR data over the BELMANIP sites were further normalized in order to remove the differences in the growth of the varying vegetation. Based on the normalized NDVI and NBR, kernel density estimation (KDE) was used to create a universal measure of undisturbed vegetation, which described the uniform spectral frequency distribution of different undisturbed vegetation with a series of accumulated probabilities on a monthly basis. Whenever a new Landsat observation is collected, the vegetation anomalies are determined according to the universal measure in NRT. To demonstrate the potential of this framework, three study areas with different anomaly types (deforestation, fire event, and insect outbreak) in distinct ecozones (rainforest, coniferous forest, and deciduous broad-leaf forest) were used. The quantitative analyses showed generally high overall accuracies (>90% with the kappa >0.82). The user accuracy for the fire event and the producer accuracy for the earlier insect infestation were relatively lower. The accuracies may be affected by the complexity of the land surface, the quality of the Landsat image, and the accumulated probability threshold.