On Twelve Shades of Green: Assessing the Levels of Environmental Protection in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Abstract The paper examines twelve legal regimes related to the governance and regulation of both the environmental risks and opportunities brought forth by the use of AI systems and AI models in the Artificial Intelligence Act (‘AIA’) of EU law. The assessment of risks and opportunities of AI related to the environment includes the high-risk management procedures under Art. 9 of the AIA, the “fundamental rights impact assessment” of Art. 27, and the codes of conduct of Art. 95. These provisions are supplemented by further regulatory regimes, such as the proposal of EU directive on sustainable consumption and green claims, and Reg. (EU) 2023/588 on environmental and space sustainability, among others. The aim of the analysis is to specify which are the less or the more environmentally friendly regulatory regimes set up with the AIA. The claim is that Art. 9, 27 and 95 are among the less green pieces of the whole legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minds and Machines
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09713-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Twelve Shades of Green: Assessing the Levels of Environmental Protection in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Ugo Pagallo
3 citations
Minds and Machines
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
7.44
article

On Twelve Shades of Green: Assessing the Levels of Environmental Protection in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Ugo Pagallo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The paper examines twelve legal regimes related to the governance and regulation of both the environmental risks and opportunities brought forth by the use of AI systems and AI models in the Artificial Intelligence Act (‘AIA’) of EU law. The assessment of risks and opportunities of AI related to the environment includes the high-risk management procedures under Art. 9 of the AIA, the “fundamental rights impact assessment” of Art. 27, and the codes of conduct of Art. 95. These provisions are supplemented by further regulatory regimes, such as the proposal of EU directive on sustainable consumption and green claims, and Reg. (EU) 2023/588 on environmental and space sustainability, among others. The aim of the analysis is to specify which are the less or the more environmentally friendly regulatory regimes set up with the AIA. The claim is that Art. 9, 27 and 95 are among the less green pieces of the whole legislation.

Minds and MachinesVol. 35(1)
Department of Medical Sciences (BY), University of Turin (IT)
Università degli Studi di Torino
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.