Comparison of the Effectiveness of Artificial Neural Networks and Elastic Net Regression in Surface Runoff Modeling

This study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Elastic Net regression for predicting surface runoff in urban stormwater catchments. Both models were trained on a data set derived from the Stormwater Management Model that included parameters such as imperviousness, flow path width, slope, Manning coefficients, and depression storage. ANN exhibited greater predictive accuracy and stability, especially when modeling nonlinear hydrologic interactions, while Elastic Net offered faster inference and clearer interpretability, but showed reduced accuracy in low-flow conditions. Validation on real-world data revealed the sensitivity of the models to scenarios not fully represented during training. Despite higher computational demands, the ANN proved more adaptable, while the more resource-efficient Elastic Net remains suitable for time-critical or large-scale applications. These findings provide practical insights for urban water resource management, indicating when each approach can be most effectively used in flood risk assessment and stormwater infrastructure planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030405
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Artificial Neural Networks and Elastic Net Regression in Surface Runoff Modeling

Jacek Dawidowicz, Rafał Buczyński
4 citations
Water
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
3.20
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Artificial Neural Networks and Elastic Net Regression in Surface Runoff Modeling

Jacek Dawidowicz, Rafał Buczyński
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Elastic Net regression for predicting surface runoff in urban stormwater catchments. Both models were trained on a data set derived from the Stormwater Management Model that included parameters such as imperviousness, flow path width, slope, Manning coefficients, and depression storage. ANN exhibited greater predictive accuracy and stability, especially when modeling nonlinear hydrologic interactions, while Elastic Net offered faster inference and clearer interpretability, but showed reduced accuracy in low-flow conditions. Validation on real-world data revealed the sensitivity of the models to scenarios not fully represented during training. Despite higher computational demands, the ANN proved more adaptable, while the more resource-efficient Elastic Net remains suitable for time-critical or large-scale applications. These findings provide practical insights for urban water resource management, indicating when each approach can be most effectively used in flood risk assessment and stormwater infrastructure planning.

WaterVol. 17(3)
Bialystok University of Technology (PL)
Politechnika Bialostocka
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.