Nuremberg After Seventy-Five Years: A Reflection and Assessment of its Influence on International Law

Seventy-five decades have elapsed since the conclusion of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (IMT). Its influence on international law has been incalculable. Its two main contributions have been the concepts “crimes against humanity” and “crime of genocide”. The former concept was owing to the influence on the proceedings of Hersch Lauterpacht, and the latter to that of Raphael Lemkin. Lauterpacht was an academic from Cambridge University, and Lemkin was an academic from Duke University. The concept “crimes against humanity” ultimately got a central role in the proceedings and, for the first time in history, was recognised to be an established part of international law. None of the IMT defendants were found guilty of genocide but the introduction of the concept during the proceedings led to the speedy adoption of the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obiter
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/dxkz2x35
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nuremberg After Seventy-Five Years: A Reflection and Assessment of its Influence on International Law

G.N. Barrie
Obiter
International Law and Human Rights
article

Nuremberg After Seventy-Five Years: A Reflection and Assessment of its Influence on International Law

G.N. Barrie
article en

Abstract

Seventy-five decades have elapsed since the conclusion of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (IMT). Its influence on international law has been incalculable. Its two main contributions have been the concepts “crimes against humanity” and “crime of genocide”. The former concept was owing to the influence on the proceedings of Hersch Lauterpacht, and the latter to that of Raphael Lemkin. Lauterpacht was an academic from Cambridge University, and Lemkin was an academic from Duke University. The concept “crimes against humanity” ultimately got a central role in the proceedings and, for the first time in history, was recognised to be an established part of international law. None of the IMT defendants were found guilty of genocide but the introduction of the concept during the proceedings led to the speedy adoption of the 1948 Genocide Convention.

ObiterVol. 45(4)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.