Time to inhibit: P300 amplitude differences in individuals with high and low temporal efficiency

Temporal processing and inhibitory control are closely interconnected. This study investigated whether individuals of high and low temporal efficiency display different behavioral and neural patterns while performing an electrophysiological Go/No-Go task. Individuals with lower temporal processing had significantly poorer behavioral performance of the task-slower reaction times to Go stimuli, greater number of omissions, and lower stimulus detectability (lower d-prime value)-than the high temporal efficiency group. Additionally, participants with low temporal efficiency had significantly lower P300 response to correct inhibitions (No-Go stimuli) compared to those with high temporal efficiency. Furthermore, the greater amplitude of the difference wave (No-Go vs Go) in the high temporal efficiency group may suggest superior efficacy of response inhibition and attention control processes in comparison to the low temporal efficiency group. These findings highlight significant differences in inhibitory control at both behavioral and neural levels in young adults differing in temporal processing efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae500
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time to inhibit: P300 amplitude differences in individuals with high and low temporal efficiency

Elżbieta Szeląg, Klaudia Krystecka, Aneta Szymaszek, Magdalena Stanczyk et al.
2 citations
Cerebral Cortex
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
2.86
article

Time to inhibit: P300 amplitude differences in individuals with high and low temporal efficiency

Elżbieta Szeląg, Klaudia Krystecka, Aneta Szymaszek, Magdalena Stanczyk, Mateusz Choiński
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Temporal processing and inhibitory control are closely interconnected. This study investigated whether individuals of high and low temporal efficiency display different behavioral and neural patterns while performing an electrophysiological Go/No-Go task. Individuals with lower temporal processing had significantly poorer behavioral performance of the task-slower reaction times to Go stimuli, greater number of omissions, and lower stimulus detectability (lower d-prime value)-than the high temporal efficiency group. Additionally, participants with low temporal efficiency had significantly lower P300 response to correct inhibitions (No-Go stimuli) compared to those with high temporal efficiency. Furthermore, the greater amplitude of the difference wave (No-Go vs Go) in the high temporal efficiency group may suggest superior efficacy of response inhibition and attention control processes in comparison to the low temporal efficiency group. These findings highlight significant differences in inhibitory control at both behavioral and neural levels in young adults differing in temporal processing efficiency.

Cerebral CortexVol. 35(2)
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL), University of Warsaw (PL), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Time to inhibit: P300 amplitude differences in individuals with high and low temporal efficiency — Elżbieta Szeląg, Klaudia Krystecka, et al. · Cerebral Cortex (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS