Evaluation of pre-analytical errors using six sigma metrics towards quality of laboratory performance in an Indian tertiary care hospital

Six Sigma methodologies is one of the standard management system adopted to check the quality and improve laboratory performance continuously by assessing the laboratory process using six sigma metrics. A one-year prospective study from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted at the laboratory of medicine department in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 162974 samples were received from both inpatient and outpatient departments and total laboratory errors were found to be 1144, with the maximum errors identified in the pre-analytical phase coming out to be 978 (0.6%). The types of errors in the pre-analytical phase after being identified and categorized were hemolyzed samples, clotted samples, phlebotomy errors, etc. The most typical error identified was clotted sample error (0.29%) followed by haemolysed sample error (0.20%). After calculating the error rate or defects per million error samples on a Sigma calculator, the value obtained was between 4 and 5 which an average class quality. Thus, we show that continuous and repeated recognition of errors and evaluating them using Six Sigma metrics can help achieve overall laboratory procedure quality and better clinical diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/9732063002001418
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of pre-analytical errors using six sigma metrics towards quality of laboratory performance in an Indian tertiary care hospital

Soumita Seth, Neera Sah, Neha Rajwal
2 citations
Bioinformation
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
0.65
article

Evaluation of pre-analytical errors using six sigma metrics towards quality of laboratory performance in an Indian tertiary care hospital

Soumita Seth, Neera Sah, Neha Rajwal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Six Sigma methodologies is one of the standard management system adopted to check the quality and improve laboratory performance continuously by assessing the laboratory process using six sigma metrics. A one-year prospective study from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted at the laboratory of medicine department in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 162974 samples were received from both inpatient and outpatient departments and total laboratory errors were found to be 1144, with the maximum errors identified in the pre-analytical phase coming out to be 978 (0.6%). The types of errors in the pre-analytical phase after being identified and categorized were hemolyzed samples, clotted samples, phlebotomy errors, etc. The most typical error identified was clotted sample error (0.29%) followed by haemolysed sample error (0.20%). After calculating the error rate or defects per million error samples on a Sigma calculator, the value obtained was between 4 and 5 which an average class quality. Thus, we show that continuous and repeated recognition of errors and evaluating them using Six Sigma metrics can help achieve overall laboratory procedure quality and better clinical diagnosis.

BioinformationVol. 20(10)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.