A Comparison of Presidential Threshold Systems in Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections in Indonesia and Brazil

The purpose of this comparison is the reconstruction of the law. The requirements for future presidents and vice presidential candidates are listed in Article 6a, paragraph 2. However, the pros and cons of this rule are still often raised, as it reduces the individual's right to stand as president and vice president, thus requiring legislative amendments. This research uses a method of normative law research, where the approach used in this research is a legal approach and a comparative approach. The threshold in Brazil is different from Indonesia. According to J. Mark Payne, when discussing the threshold in the presidential election, what is meant is the condition of a presidential candidate to be elected president. The threshold for elected presidents in Brazil with 50% + 1 vote is laid down in Article 147. In Indonesia, such a limit is a condition for the nomination of a President and Vice-President to advance in the contest for the election of the President and Vice-Presidents. In contrast, the threshing limit for nomination for the President of the Republic of Indonesia is in Article 222, which stipulates that the pair of candidates must be proposed by the political party or association of political parties participating in the election and meet the requirement to obtain 20% (twenty percent) of the number of seats in the House of Representatives or 25% (Twenty-five percent) from the national valid votes in the previous election of members of the House.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i1.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Presidential Threshold Systems in Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections in Indonesia and Brazil

Muhammad Zhafran Shobirin, Moh Akbar Adhiyanto, Sholeh Hoddin, Khabib Syaikhu Rohman
1 citations
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
2.23
article

A Comparison of Presidential Threshold Systems in Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections in Indonesia and Brazil

Muhammad Zhafran Shobirin, Moh Akbar Adhiyanto, Sholeh Hoddin, Khabib Syaikhu Rohman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this comparison is the reconstruction of the law. The requirements for future presidents and vice presidential candidates are listed in Article 6a, paragraph 2. However, the pros and cons of this rule are still often raised, as it reduces the individual's right to stand as president and vice president, thus requiring legislative amendments. This research uses a method of normative law research, where the approach used in this research is a legal approach and a comparative approach. The threshold in Brazil is different from Indonesia. According to J. Mark Payne, when discussing the threshold in the presidential election, what is meant is the condition of a presidential candidate to be elected president. The threshold for elected presidents in Brazil with 50% + 1 vote is laid down in Article 147. In Indonesia, such a limit is a condition for the nomination of a President and Vice-President to advance in the contest for the election of the President and Vice-Presidents. In contrast, the threshing limit for nomination for the President of the Republic of Indonesia is in Article 222, which stipulates that the pair of candidates must be proposed by the political party or association of political parties participating in the election and meet the requirement to obtain 20% (twenty percent) of the number of seats in the House of Representatives or 25% (Twenty-five percent) from the national valid votes in the previous election of members of the House.

Journal of Indonesian Constitutional LawVol. 1(1)
Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura (ID), Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.