Can Democracy Protect Lower-Income Countries From Becoming Pollution Havens?

Lower-income countries absorb a substantial part of other countries’ consumption-related environmental footprints, with international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) serving as the conduit for this environmental “insourcing.” We examine whether democratic institutions could help mitigate the risk of lower-income countries becoming pollution havens in this context. Using data on CO 2 emissions for all non-OECD countries in 1990–2019, we find that democratic institutions can indeed mitigate the otherwise pollution-increasing effect of trade and FDI. Substantively, this mitigation effect is in the order of 0.14 metric tons of CO 2 per capita and, thus, quite substantial. We also observe similar effects for more broadly defined environmental footprint measures. Overall, the evidence we present is consistent with the expectation that democracy helps in protecting lower-income countries against disproportionately accumulating polluting economic activity in an open global economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Environment & Development
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251317436
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Democracy Protect Lower-Income Countries From Becoming Pollution Havens?

Thomas Bernauer, Ella Henninger, Tobias Böhmelt
3 citations
The Journal of Environment & Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
9.39
article

Can Democracy Protect Lower-Income Countries From Becoming Pollution Havens?

Thomas Bernauer, Ella Henninger, Tobias Böhmelt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Lower-income countries absorb a substantial part of other countries’ consumption-related environmental footprints, with international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) serving as the conduit for this environmental “insourcing.” We examine whether democratic institutions could help mitigate the risk of lower-income countries becoming pollution havens in this context. Using data on CO 2 emissions for all non-OECD countries in 1990–2019, we find that democratic institutions can indeed mitigate the otherwise pollution-increasing effect of trade and FDI. Substantively, this mitigation effect is in the order of 0.14 metric tons of CO 2 per capita and, thus, quite substantial. We also observe similar effects for more broadly defined environmental footprint measures. Overall, the evidence we present is consistent with the expectation that democracy helps in protecting lower-income countries against disproportionately accumulating polluting economic activity in an open global economy.

The Journal of Environment & DevelopmentVol. 34(3)
University of Essex (GB), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Democracy Protect Lower-Income Countries From Becoming Pollution Havens? — Thomas Bernauer, Ella Henninger, et al. · The Journal of Environment & Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS