A preliminary simulator study on exploring responses of drivers to driving system reminders on four stimuli in vehicles

In the realm of autonomous vehicles, society is undergoing a transition from conventional human-driven vehicles to autonomous driving systems. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for vehicles integrated with assistive driving systems. This pilot study designed to explore which type of driving system reminders, namely Text display, Image display, alarm notification, or humanoid voice command, provokes stronger preferences and higher rates of cooperation from drivers. A high-fidelity driving simulator mainly consisting of a Logitech PlayStation driving system, a reminder playing system and an emotion-detecting model was developed in a lab-setting environment. A cohort of participants (N = 6) was recruited to participate in the experiment, where they were tasked with completing assignments across four driving sessions, followed by a subsequent questionnaire. During each driving session, the participants were exposed to six reminders designed for different driving conditions, including seatbelt check, fuel level check, rear mirror check, over speed reminder, obstacles reminder and drowsy driving reminder. Concurrently, the participants' driving performance was observed by the researcher, while changes in their emotional states were detected by the model. Subsequent to the driving sessions, participants were invited to complete a questionnaire for assessing the various formats of driving reminders presented by the four stimuli, utilizing a 5-level Likert scale. The results revealed that driving reminders with sounds (alarm notification and humanoid voice command) exhibited higher recognition and cooperation rates among drivers than the silent reminders (text display and image display). Participants demonstrated stronger preferences for Voice-based driving reminders, which aligns with the observed behaviours of drivers. Despite the limitations of a small sample size of participants, this within-subject study which collected data from 24 individual driving sessions (6 participants x 4 driving sessions) provides insights on enhancing communication between human drivers and computer-assisted driving systems by developing improved alert systems for drivers. It also seeks to enhance the field of automotive user interface design by developing more intuitive and responsive interactions between humans and humanoid-assistant in future autonomous vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87571-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A preliminary simulator study on exploring responses of drivers to driving system reminders on four stimuli in vehicles

Luqman Ali, Omar Mubin, Hamad Al Jassmi, Michael Lwin et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
9.75
article

A preliminary simulator study on exploring responses of drivers to driving system reminders on four stimuli in vehicles

Luqman Ali, Omar Mubin, Hamad Al Jassmi, Michael Lwin, Fady S.K. Alnajjar, Zhao Zou, Muhammad Swavaf
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In the realm of autonomous vehicles, society is undergoing a transition from conventional human-driven vehicles to autonomous driving systems. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for vehicles integrated with assistive driving systems. This pilot study designed to explore which type of driving system reminders, namely Text display, Image display, alarm notification, or humanoid voice command, provokes stronger preferences and higher rates of cooperation from drivers. A high-fidelity driving simulator mainly consisting of a Logitech PlayStation driving system, a reminder playing system and an emotion-detecting model was developed in a lab-setting environment. A cohort of participants (N = 6) was recruited to participate in the experiment, where they were tasked with completing assignments across four driving sessions, followed by a subsequent questionnaire. During each driving session, the participants were exposed to six reminders designed for different driving conditions, including seatbelt check, fuel level check, rear mirror check, over speed reminder, obstacles reminder and drowsy driving reminder. Concurrently, the participants' driving performance was observed by the researcher, while changes in their emotional states were detected by the model. Subsequent to the driving sessions, participants were invited to complete a questionnaire for assessing the various formats of driving reminders presented by the four stimuli, utilizing a 5-level Likert scale. The results revealed that driving reminders with sounds (alarm notification and humanoid voice command) exhibited higher recognition and cooperation rates among drivers than the silent reminders (text display and image display). Participants demonstrated stronger preferences for Voice-based driving reminders, which aligns with the observed behaviours of drivers. Despite the limitations of a small sample size of participants, this within-subject study which collected data from 24 individual driving sessions (6 participants x 4 driving sessions) provides insights on enhancing communication between human drivers and computer-assisted driving systems by developing improved alert systems for drivers. It also seeks to enhance the field of automotive user interface design by developing more intuitive and responsive interactions between humans and humanoid-assistant in future autonomous vehicles.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
United Arab Emirates University (AE), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.