Revolutionising Essay Evaluation

This study aims to develop a robust rubric for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted essay writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. Employing a modified Delphi technique, we conducted a comprehensive literature review and administered Likert scale questionnaires. This process yielded nine key evaluation criteria, forming the initial rubric. The rubric was applied to evaluate 33 AI-assisted essays written by students as part of an intensive course assignment. Statistical analysis revealed significant inter-rater reliability and convergent validity coefficients, supporting the adoption and further development of such rubrics across higher education institutions. The developed rubric was subsequently used to evaluate these essays using two AI tools: ChatGPT and Claude. The results indicated that both AI tools evaluated the essays with similar scores, demonstrating consistency in their assessment capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.368226
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revolutionising Essay Evaluation

Hassan Saleh Mahdi, Abdullah Al-Khateeb
4 citations
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
8.43
article

Revolutionising Essay Evaluation

Hassan Saleh Mahdi, Abdullah Al-Khateeb
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study aims to develop a robust rubric for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted essay writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. Employing a modified Delphi technique, we conducted a comprehensive literature review and administered Likert scale questionnaires. This process yielded nine key evaluation criteria, forming the initial rubric. The rubric was applied to evaluate 33 AI-assisted essays written by students as part of an intensive course assignment. Statistical analysis revealed significant inter-rater reliability and convergent validity coefficients, supporting the adoption and further development of such rubrics across higher education institutions. The developed rubric was subsequently used to evaluate these essays using two AI tools: ChatGPT and Claude. The results indicated that both AI tools evaluated the essays with similar scores, demonstrating consistency in their assessment capabilities.

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and TeachingVol. 15(1)
Arab Open University (SA), King Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revolutionising Essay Evaluation — Hassan Saleh Mahdi, Abdullah Al-Khateeb · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS