NextEra/9REN v. Spain: The Latest in the Recognition and Enforcement of ICSID Arbitral Award in Intra-EU Dispute

The decision of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in joined cases NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. and NextEra Energy S Pain Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, and 9REN Holding S.A.R.L. v. Kingdom of Spain, confirms that national courts are not prevented from recognizing and enforcing intra-EU ICSID arbitral awards. While some issues raised by the parties could have been conclusively determined by the Court, the value of the decision cannot be diminished. In fact, the decision validates the significance of the ICSID Convention and of the original commitment of the drafters of the Convention to the final and binding nature of the ICSID arbitral awards. Moreover, the decision confirms that the intra-EU development which has generated a ‘complex international puzzle’ does not weaken the reality that the overall rate of voluntary compliance and post-award settlement of ICSID awards is of 90%, with a further 7% of awards being satisfied following successful enforcement proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Arbitration
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2025012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NextEra/9REN v. Spain: The Latest in the Recognition and Enforcement of ICSID Arbitral Award in Intra-EU Dispute

Crina Baltag, Loukas Mistelis
1 citations
Journal of International Arbitration
International Arbitration and Investment Law
2.23
article

NextEra/9REN v. Spain: The Latest in the Recognition and Enforcement of ICSID Arbitral Award in Intra-EU Dispute

Crina Baltag, Loukas Mistelis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The decision of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in joined cases NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. and NextEra Energy S Pain Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, and 9REN Holding S.A.R.L. v. Kingdom of Spain, confirms that national courts are not prevented from recognizing and enforcing intra-EU ICSID arbitral awards. While some issues raised by the parties could have been conclusively determined by the Court, the value of the decision cannot be diminished. In fact, the decision validates the significance of the ICSID Convention and of the original commitment of the drafters of the Convention to the final and binding nature of the ICSID arbitral awards. Moreover, the decision confirms that the intra-EU development which has generated a ‘complex international puzzle’ does not weaken the reality that the overall rate of voluntary compliance and post-award settlement of ICSID awards is of 90%, with a further 7% of awards being satisfied following successful enforcement proceedings.

Journal of International ArbitrationVol. 42(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NextEra/9REN v. Spain: The Latest in the Recognition and Enforcement of ICSID Arbitral Award in Intra-EU Dispute — Crina Baltag, Loukas Mistelis · Journal of International Arbitration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS