Inner and outer domains for Hawaiian causatives and nominalizers

Hawaiian valency-related morphology includes a complex set of surface forms which have traditionally been understood as causatives. Despite phonological similarity among this set of forms, these have traditionally been analyzed as separate morphemes. A closer view of their distribution and argument structure suggests an analysis in which these forms are allomorphs of one underlying, valency-increasing morpheme. A similar analysis of two nominalizing forms suggests that these are also allomorphs of one valency-decreasing morpheme. In each case (causatives and nominalizers), an analysis of surface realization is presented in terms of inner (or root-selecting) and outer domains. With the analysis of causatives and nominalizers in place, corpus evidence suggests that the inner causative allomorph and inner nominalizing allomorph do not co-occur, even though co-occurrence of the inner nominalizer and the outer causative is common. This data suggests a morpho-syntactic view of word formation, according to which morphological properties result from general properties of the morpho-syntax, such as the availability of only one root-selecting position for a given root.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9194
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inner and outer domains for Hawaiian causatives and nominalizers

Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Intellectual Property Law
article

Inner and outer domains for Hawaiian causatives and nominalizers

article en

Abstract

Hawaiian valency-related morphology includes a complex set of surface forms which have traditionally been understood as causatives. Despite phonological similarity among this set of forms, these have traditionally been analyzed as separate morphemes. A closer view of their distribution and argument structure suggests an analysis in which these forms are allomorphs of one underlying, valency-increasing morpheme. A similar analysis of two nominalizing forms suggests that these are also allomorphs of one valency-decreasing morpheme. In each case (causatives and nominalizers), an analysis of surface realization is presented in terms of inner (or root-selecting) and outer domains. With the analysis of causatives and nominalizers in place, corpus evidence suggests that the inner causative allomorph and inner nominalizing allomorph do not co-occur, even though co-occurrence of the inner nominalizer and the outer causative is common. This data suggests a morpho-syntactic view of word formation, according to which morphological properties result from general properties of the morpho-syntax, such as the availability of only one root-selecting position for a given root.

Glossa a journal of general linguisticsVol. 10(1)
California State University, Northridge (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inner and outer domains for Hawaiian causatives and nominalizers · Glossa a journal of general linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS