The effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners in different thicknesses

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, pain, and satisfaction levels of patients treated with different thicknesses of clear aligners among class I maxillary mild crowding cases. Twenty-eight subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 were treated with 0.5 mm-thick aligners and group 2 were treated with 0.75 mm-thick aligners. Maxillary models were printed using a 3-dimensional printer and aligners were produced using a vacuum thermoforming machine. The amount of orthodontic tooth movement was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment digital models and lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning and end of the treatment. Pain and satisfaction levels were measured before aligner insertion, at the 4th hour, 2nd day, 1st week, 1st month and at the end of the treatment. Increases in maxillary intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths, and dental arch perimeter were significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.05). The pain levels peaked at T1 and decreased gradually in both groups; group 2 demonstrated greater pain levels. Group 1 reported significantly greater satisfaction levels (p < 0.05). Aligner thickness is a key determinant of the extent of orthodontic tooth movement. Treatment with a 0.5 mm-thick aligner provides enhanced comfort for patients, but a 0.75 mm-thick aligner yields more efficient treatment results.Trial registration: The trial was registered on https://ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively with the registration number of NCT06504498, on 16/07/2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86345-9
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners in different thicknesses

Seda Cengiz, Merve Göymen
7 citations
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
11.73
article

The effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners in different thicknesses

Seda Cengiz, Merve Göymen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, pain, and satisfaction levels of patients treated with different thicknesses of clear aligners among class I maxillary mild crowding cases. Twenty-eight subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 were treated with 0.5 mm-thick aligners and group 2 were treated with 0.75 mm-thick aligners. Maxillary models were printed using a 3-dimensional printer and aligners were produced using a vacuum thermoforming machine. The amount of orthodontic tooth movement was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment digital models and lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning and end of the treatment. Pain and satisfaction levels were measured before aligner insertion, at the 4th hour, 2nd day, 1st week, 1st month and at the end of the treatment. Increases in maxillary intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths, and dental arch perimeter were significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.05). The pain levels peaked at T1 and decreased gradually in both groups; group 2 demonstrated greater pain levels. Group 1 reported significantly greater satisfaction levels (p < 0.05). Aligner thickness is a key determinant of the extent of orthodontic tooth movement. Treatment with a 0.5 mm-thick aligner provides enhanced comfort for patients, but a 0.75 mm-thick aligner yields more efficient treatment results.Trial registration: The trial was registered on https://ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively with the registration number of NCT06504498, on 16/07/2024.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Mersin Üniversitesi (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Gaziantep Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.