Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.v., Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed. Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting. However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron. Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i2.4394
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Ankita Gupta, Jitendra Agrawal, Vankudoth Bhaskar, Ashish Mohan M
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Ankita Gupta, Jitendra Agrawal, Vankudoth Bhaskar, Ashish Mohan M
article en

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.v., Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed. Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting. However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron. Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 16(2)
Gajara Raja Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia — Ankita Gupta, Jitendra Agrawal, et al. · Asian Journal of Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS