Methodical Conflict among the Ways for Drying out of Historic Masonry

The purpose of this paper is to give a focus on evaluation of effectiveness of technologies aimed on remedy of unwanted moisture in masonry constructions of historic architectural heritage buildings standing under architectural heritage protection. There are many ways how to achieve the wonted state of the constructions, but some of them are quite invasive, some are not that much invasive and some of them are doubtful. The usual resistance of a group of officers of Heritage authorities to invasive technologies makes the practise complicated, as the, so called invasive technologies are usually the most effective. Officers usually welcome not that much invasive technologies and a special place in their understanding of this problem is held by the Method of Sequential Steps. This method is based on step by step introduced ways of solving of the problem, which should start with minimal interventions and continue towards more intervening interventions. This approach might be relatively sensitive to the structures, but it takes a lot of time and a success is not ensured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Czech Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51704/cjce.2024.vol10.iss1.pp34-42
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodical Conflict among the Ways for Drying out of Historic Masonry

Oto Makýš, Michal Hrčka, Attila Németh
Czech Journal of Civil Engineering
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Methodical Conflict among the Ways for Drying out of Historic Masonry

Oto Makýš, Michal Hrčka, Attila Németh
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to give a focus on evaluation of effectiveness of technologies aimed on remedy of unwanted moisture in masonry constructions of historic architectural heritage buildings standing under architectural heritage protection. There are many ways how to achieve the wonted state of the constructions, but some of them are quite invasive, some are not that much invasive and some of them are doubtful. The usual resistance of a group of officers of Heritage authorities to invasive technologies makes the practise complicated, as the, so called invasive technologies are usually the most effective. Officers usually welcome not that much invasive technologies and a special place in their understanding of this problem is held by the Method of Sequential Steps. This method is based on step by step introduced ways of solving of the problem, which should start with minimal interventions and continue towards more intervening interventions. This approach might be relatively sensitive to the structures, but it takes a lot of time and a success is not ensured.

Czech Journal of Civil EngineeringVol. 10(1)
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK), Art Research Centre of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Slovak Water Management Enterprise (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.