Lithium dreams, local struggles: Navigating the geopolitics and socio-ecological costs of a low-carbon future

The global push towards renewable energy has surged the demand for lithium, which is vital for manufacturing batteries that power electric vehicles and stabilize energy grids. This literature review examines global lithium extraction's environmental and socio-political costs to highlight the tensions between sustainable development and extractive practices in the lithium industry. A comprehensive subset of scholarship reports the degradation of ecosystems, the commodification of Indigenous lands, and the erosion of biodiversity. Scholars have attributed lithium's socio-ecological cost to green extractivism, where the green agenda promotes extractive practices reminiscent of the fossil fuel era. A second strain of literature delves into how lithium is discursively framed and legitimized through ‘sociotechnical imaginaries’ (STI). Those imaginaries embody how societies collectively envision lithium's role in shaping future socio-political and economic structures, particularly regarding national identity, sovereignty, and sustainable progress. Additionally, these imaginaries highlight the tensions between local communities, national governments, and global stakeholders over extraction's socio-environmental costs. Finally, studies also discuss the geopolitical dimensions of lithium supply chains, particularly the tensions between China and Western economies over control of critical minerals—the fight for geopolitical dominance perpetuates colonial dynamics by both stakeholders. The findings underscore the need for more sustainable extraction policies and equitable governance mechanisms that account for the socio-environmental challenges posed by lithium mining in the context of global climate goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103952
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lithium dreams, local struggles: Navigating the geopolitics and socio-ecological costs of a low-carbon future

Muhammad Sikandar Ali Chaudary
23 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Extraction and Separation Processes
16.41
article

Lithium dreams, local struggles: Navigating the geopolitics and socio-ecological costs of a low-carbon future

Muhammad Sikandar Ali Chaudary
article en
23 citations

Abstract

The global push towards renewable energy has surged the demand for lithium, which is vital for manufacturing batteries that power electric vehicles and stabilize energy grids. This literature review examines global lithium extraction's environmental and socio-political costs to highlight the tensions between sustainable development and extractive practices in the lithium industry. A comprehensive subset of scholarship reports the degradation of ecosystems, the commodification of Indigenous lands, and the erosion of biodiversity. Scholars have attributed lithium's socio-ecological cost to green extractivism, where the green agenda promotes extractive practices reminiscent of the fossil fuel era. A second strain of literature delves into how lithium is discursively framed and legitimized through ‘sociotechnical imaginaries’ (STI). Those imaginaries embody how societies collectively envision lithium's role in shaping future socio-political and economic structures, particularly regarding national identity, sovereignty, and sustainable progress. Additionally, these imaginaries highlight the tensions between local communities, national governments, and global stakeholders over extraction's socio-environmental costs. Finally, studies also discuss the geopolitical dimensions of lithium supply chains, particularly the tensions between China and Western economies over control of critical minerals—the fight for geopolitical dominance perpetuates colonial dynamics by both stakeholders. The findings underscore the need for more sustainable extraction policies and equitable governance mechanisms that account for the socio-environmental challenges posed by lithium mining in the context of global climate goals.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 121
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Extraction and Separation Processes
16.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.