Belief Shocks and Implications of Expectations About Growth‐at‐Risk

ABSTRACT This paper revisits the question of how shocks to expectations of market participants can cause business cycle fluctuations. We use a vector autoregression to estimate dynamic causal effects of belief shocks which are extracted from nowcast errors about output growth. In a first step, we replicate and corroborate the findings of Enders, Kleemann, and Müller (2021). The second step computes nowcast errors about growth‐at‐risk at various quantiles. This involves both recovering the quantiles of the nowcast distribution of output growth from the Survey of Professional Forecasters, and, since the true quantiles of output growth are unobserved, estimating them with quantile regressions. We document a lack of distinct patterns in response to shocks arising from nowcasts misjudging macroeconomic risk. Although the differences are statistically insignificant, belief shocks about downside risk seem to produce somewhat sharper business cycle fluctuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3117
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Belief Shocks and Implications of Expectations About Growth‐at‐Risk

Maximilian Boeck, Michael Pfarrhofer
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Belief Shocks and Implications of Expectations About Growth‐at‐Risk

Maximilian Boeck, Michael Pfarrhofer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper revisits the question of how shocks to expectations of market participants can cause business cycle fluctuations. We use a vector autoregression to estimate dynamic causal effects of belief shocks which are extracted from nowcast errors about output growth. In a first step, we replicate and corroborate the findings of Enders, Kleemann, and Müller (2021). The second step computes nowcast errors about growth‐at‐risk at various quantiles. This involves both recovering the quantiles of the nowcast distribution of output growth from the Survey of Professional Forecasters, and, since the true quantiles of output growth are unobserved, estimating them with quantile regressions. We document a lack of distinct patterns in response to shocks arising from nowcasts misjudging macroeconomic risk. Although the differences are statistically insignificant, belief shocks about downside risk seem to produce somewhat sharper business cycle fluctuations.

Journal of Applied EconometricsVol. 40(3)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Belief Shocks and Implications of Expectations About Growth‐at‐Risk — Maximilian Boeck, Michael Pfarrhofer · Journal of Applied Econometrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS