Do Foreign Service Providers Simply Ignore the EU Consumer Law? An Empirical Study of 100 Online Terms of Service

Abstract This article reports the results of an empirical study conducted on 100 online terms of services offered in the EU. It documents the prevalence of (potentially) unfair clauses in these contracts and discusses the outcomes of the inferential statistical analysis performed to discover any patterns of this widespread incompliance. It shows that contracts accompanying services with the main headquarters outside of the EU are significantly more likely to contain unfair terms than those originating from the EU. The article offers several possible explanations of this phenomenon, including the features of the corporations and the particularities of the European consumer law enforcement structure. Based on these findings, we offer several possible policy interventions. These include closer scrutiny of corporations from outside the Union, operationalisation of the tools for automated detection of unfair clauses, and potential legal reform, including the possibility of leveraging the enforcement structure put in place by the Digital Services Act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Policy
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09580-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Foreign Service Providers Simply Ignore the EU Consumer Law? An Empirical Study of 100 Online Terms of Service

Andrzej Porębski, Radosław Pałosz, Przemysław Pałka, Katarzyna Wiśniewska
1 citations
Journal of Consumer Policy
European and International Contract Law
15.98
article

Do Foreign Service Providers Simply Ignore the EU Consumer Law? An Empirical Study of 100 Online Terms of Service

Andrzej Porębski, Radosław Pałosz, Przemysław Pałka, Katarzyna Wiśniewska
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reports the results of an empirical study conducted on 100 online terms of services offered in the EU. It documents the prevalence of (potentially) unfair clauses in these contracts and discusses the outcomes of the inferential statistical analysis performed to discover any patterns of this widespread incompliance. It shows that contracts accompanying services with the main headquarters outside of the EU are significantly more likely to contain unfair terms than those originating from the EU. The article offers several possible explanations of this phenomenon, including the features of the corporations and the particularities of the European consumer law enforcement structure. Based on these findings, we offer several possible policy interventions. These include closer scrutiny of corporations from outside the Union, operationalisation of the tools for automated detection of unfair clauses, and potential legal reform, including the possibility of leveraging the enforcement structure put in place by the Digital Services Act.

Journal of Consumer PolicyVol. 48(3)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Norway Grants
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European and International Contract Law
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.