The phonology of letter shapes: Feature economy and informativeness in 43 writing systems

• The visual shapes of letters, contrary to the phonemes of spoken languages, lack a unified description. • With a gamified approach, we crowdsourced thousands of letter descriptions. • 43 scripts’ letters can be completely described as sets of binary features. • Compared to phonemes, letters require more such features for a complete description. • These features are also less informative in letters than in phonemes. Differentiating letter shapes accurately is a core competence for any reader. Are letter shapes as distinctive as they could be? The visual shapes of letters, contrary to the phonemes of spoken languages, lack a unified description — an equivalent of the phonological features that describe most phonemes in the world’s languages. Using a gamified crowdsourcing approach, we elicited thousands of letter descriptions from lay people for the sets of letter shapes (the scripts) used in 43 diverse writing systems. Using 19,591 letter classifications, contributed by 1,683 participants, who were asked to sort the letters of each script repeatedly into two groups, we extracted a sufficient number of binary classifications (features) to provide a unique description for all letters in the 43 scripts. We show that scripts, compared to phoneme inventories, use more features to produce similar sets of distinct elements. Compared to the phoneme inventories of a large sample of the world’s languages dataset (the P-base dataset, collected by another team), our 43 scripts have lower feature economy (fewer symbols for a given number of features) and lower feature informativeness (a less balanced distribution of feature values). Compared to phonemes, letter shapes require more binary features for a complete description. These features are also less informative in letters than in phonemes: the chances that two random letters in a script differ on any given feature are low. Letter shapes, which have more degrees of freedom than speech sounds, use those degrees of freedom less efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Memory and Language
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2025.104620
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The phonology of letter shapes: Feature economy and informativeness in 43 writing systems

Marc Allassonnière‐Tang, Yoolim Kim, Helena Miton, Olivier Morin
Journal of Memory and Language
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

The phonology of letter shapes: Feature economy and informativeness in 43 writing systems

Marc Allassonnière‐Tang, Yoolim Kim, Helena Miton, Olivier Morin
article en

Abstract

• The visual shapes of letters, contrary to the phonemes of spoken languages, lack a unified description. • With a gamified approach, we crowdsourced thousands of letter descriptions. • 43 scripts’ letters can be completely described as sets of binary features. • Compared to phonemes, letters require more such features for a complete description. • These features are also less informative in letters than in phonemes. Differentiating letter shapes accurately is a core competence for any reader. Are letter shapes as distinctive as they could be? The visual shapes of letters, contrary to the phonemes of spoken languages, lack a unified description — an equivalent of the phonological features that describe most phonemes in the world’s languages. Using a gamified crowdsourcing approach, we elicited thousands of letter descriptions from lay people for the sets of letter shapes (the scripts) used in 43 diverse writing systems. Using 19,591 letter classifications, contributed by 1,683 participants, who were asked to sort the letters of each script repeatedly into two groups, we extracted a sufficient number of binary classifications (features) to provide a unique description for all letters in the 43 scripts. We show that scripts, compared to phoneme inventories, use more features to produce similar sets of distinct elements. Compared to the phoneme inventories of a large sample of the world’s languages dataset (the P-base dataset, collected by another team), our 43 scripts have lower feature economy (fewer symbols for a given number of features) and lower feature informativeness (a less balanced distribution of feature values). Compared to phonemes, letter shapes require more binary features for a complete description. These features are also less informative in letters than in phonemes: the chances that two random letters in a script differ on any given feature are low. Letter shapes, which have more degrees of freedom than speech sounds, use those degrees of freedom less efficiently.

Journal of Memory and LanguageVol. 142
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Carleton College (US), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Institut Jean Nicod (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Éco-Anthropologie (FR), Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (DE), Musée de l'Homme (FR), Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.