States, global power and access to medicines: a comparative case study of China, India and the United States, 2000–2019

From 2000-2019, China and India increased their structural powers to shape global access to medical technologies. The recent COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that both structural power and political decisions shaped global access to COVID-19 technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalization and Health
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01092-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

States, global power and access to medicines: a comparative case study of China, India and the United States, 2000–2019

Berit Sofie Hustad Hembre, Fátima Suleman, Kristin Ingstad Sandberg, John‐Arne Røttingen et al.
2 citations
Globalization and Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
4.42
article

States, global power and access to medicines: a comparative case study of China, India and the United States, 2000–2019

Berit Sofie Hustad Hembre, Fátima Suleman, Kristin Ingstad Sandberg, John‐Arne Røttingen, Steven J. Hoffman, Maulik Chokshi, Steinar Andresen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

From 2000-2019, China and India increased their structural powers to shape global access to medical technologies. The recent COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that both structural power and political decisions shaped global access to COVID-19 technologies.

Globalization and HealthVol. 21(1)
University of Zululand (ZA), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Oslo (NO), York University (CA), Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (NO), Fridtjof Nansen Institute (NO), Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Population Services International (IN), University College London (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Norges Forskningsråd, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.