Stanley Nyamfukudza’s The Non-Believer’s Journey: A Critique of Zimbabwe’s Nationalist Discourses

This article argues that The Non-Believer’s Journey (1980), a novel by Zimbabwean author Stanley Nyamfukudza, is a narrative which is sceptical of the anticolonial nationalist project, specifically the liberation struggle of the 1970s in the then colony of Rhodesia. The discussion insists that Nyamfukudza’s novel subverts histories, metanarratives, and group identities that nationalists use in their attempt to concretise the idea of a homogeneous nation. In subverting these histories and narratives, Nyamfukudza shows that although the colonised black people in Rhodesia occupy the margins of the colony, they cannot be imagined in terms of homogeneity because they have different subjectivities. The article concludes that nationalism’s quest for homogeneity ironically becomes a force that represses the very colonised people that it seeks to liberate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imbizo
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6565/17960
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stanley Nyamfukudza’s The Non-Believer’s Journey: A Critique of Zimbabwe’s Nationalist Discourses

Rangarirai Alfred Musvoto
Imbizo
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Stanley Nyamfukudza’s The Non-Believer’s Journey: A Critique of Zimbabwe’s Nationalist Discourses

Rangarirai Alfred Musvoto
article en

Abstract

This article argues that The Non-Believer’s Journey (1980), a novel by Zimbabwean author Stanley Nyamfukudza, is a narrative which is sceptical of the anticolonial nationalist project, specifically the liberation struggle of the 1970s in the then colony of Rhodesia. The discussion insists that Nyamfukudza’s novel subverts histories, metanarratives, and group identities that nationalists use in their attempt to concretise the idea of a homogeneous nation. In subverting these histories and narratives, Nyamfukudza shows that although the colonised black people in Rhodesia occupy the margins of the colony, they cannot be imagined in terms of homogeneity because they have different subjectivities. The article concludes that nationalism’s quest for homogeneity ironically becomes a force that represses the very colonised people that it seeks to liberate.

Imbizo
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.