Localized sensing data-driven efficacy evaluation of heat stress mitigation techniques in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple cultivar

• Sensing can help track fruit surface temperature (FST) and optimize heat mitigation. • Conventional, fogging, and fognet treatment effectively reduced apple FST. • Preset ON OFF cycle frequency may not be ideal for conventional cooling. • Mitigation techniques considerably influence fruit maturity and storage performances. • Storage outcomes were affected by the crop load, fruit size, and canopy vigor. This study was conducted in a commercial ‘Honeycrisp’ apple orchard in 2021 and 2022 season to understand the effectiveness of cyclic evaporative cooling (conventional), continuous fogging, netting and combination of fogging and netting (fognet) in mitigating heat stress on fruits and associated effects on post-harvest fruit quality. Heat stress on fruits was quantified continually during each season using air (T air ) and fruit surface temperature (FST) data collected by a localized crop physiology sensing system. Results indicated that heat stress on fruits in terms of pre- and post-harvest fruit quality was governed by the time for which fruits were subjected to T air > 32 °C and resultant total heat accumulation. Additionally, effectiveness of heat stress mitigation was influenced by fruits exposure time to direct solar radiation, in season fruit size and crop load. Except netting, all other treatments were effective in removing accumulated heat and maintaining FST below 45 °C fruit sunburn threshold. Although effective, conventional treatment failed to maintain FST below threshold during extreme heat hours (T air > 32 °C) suggesting adjustments needed in its cyclic operations. FST and T air data were then contrasted against fruit size, crop load, and percent sunburn at harvest. Similarly, data was contrasted for postharvest performance evaluation, disorders (bitter pit, soft scald) and maturity, until six months of storage. With higher T air , FST, and smaller fruits, netting delayed fruit maturity in both seasons. Significant difference was observed in bitter pit and soft scald incidence between netting and other treatments only in 2022 season. Insignificant differences in maturity and disorders between fogging, fognet, and conventional implied that fognet has no specific advantage over fogging and conventional cooling technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Horticulturae
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.113992
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Localized sensing data-driven efficacy evaluation of heat stress mitigation techniques in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple cultivar

Nisit Pukrongta, Lav R. Khot, Rakesh Ranjan, Bernardita V. Sallato et al.
3 citations
Scientia Horticulturae
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.26
article

Localized sensing data-driven efficacy evaluation of heat stress mitigation techniques in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple cultivar

Nisit Pukrongta, Lav R. Khot, Rakesh Ranjan, Bernardita V. Sallato, Miguel Rene Mogollón, Carolina A. Torres, Basavaraj R. Amogi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Sensing can help track fruit surface temperature (FST) and optimize heat mitigation. • Conventional, fogging, and fognet treatment effectively reduced apple FST. • Preset ON OFF cycle frequency may not be ideal for conventional cooling. • Mitigation techniques considerably influence fruit maturity and storage performances. • Storage outcomes were affected by the crop load, fruit size, and canopy vigor. This study was conducted in a commercial ‘Honeycrisp’ apple orchard in 2021 and 2022 season to understand the effectiveness of cyclic evaporative cooling (conventional), continuous fogging, netting and combination of fogging and netting (fognet) in mitigating heat stress on fruits and associated effects on post-harvest fruit quality. Heat stress on fruits was quantified continually during each season using air (T air ) and fruit surface temperature (FST) data collected by a localized crop physiology sensing system. Results indicated that heat stress on fruits in terms of pre- and post-harvest fruit quality was governed by the time for which fruits were subjected to T air > 32 °C and resultant total heat accumulation. Additionally, effectiveness of heat stress mitigation was influenced by fruits exposure time to direct solar radiation, in season fruit size and crop load. Except netting, all other treatments were effective in removing accumulated heat and maintaining FST below 45 °C fruit sunburn threshold. Although effective, conventional treatment failed to maintain FST below threshold during extreme heat hours (T air > 32 °C) suggesting adjustments needed in its cyclic operations. FST and T air data were then contrasted against fruit size, crop load, and percent sunburn at harvest. Similarly, data was contrasted for postharvest performance evaluation, disorders (bitter pit, soft scald) and maturity, until six months of storage. With higher T air , FST, and smaller fruits, netting delayed fruit maturity in both seasons. Significant difference was observed in bitter pit and soft scald incidence between netting and other treatments only in 2022 season. Insignificant differences in maturity and disorders between fogging, fognet, and conventional implied that fognet has no specific advantage over fogging and conventional cooling technique.

Scientia HorticulturaeVol. 341
Rajamangala University of Technology (TH), The Conservation Fund (US), Washington Department of Natural Resources (US), Washington State Department of Agriculture (US), Automated Precision (United States) (US), Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission (US), Washington State University (US)
Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.