Differences in Mechanical Reasoning of Engineering Students

This study aims to analyze the differences in engineering aptitude-mechanical reasoning among engineering students. This study is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional study design. This study was conducted at the Faculty of Engineering, Ogan Komering Ilir Islamic University, Kayuagung (UNISKI). The subjects of this study were selected by simple random sampling so that the number of samples obtained was 26 students of the mechanical engineering study program and 36 students of the civil engineering study program. The instrument used in this study was the aptitude-mechanical reasoning test developed by Mackellar (2015). This instrument consists of several topics, namely 1) Levers, 2) Pulleys, 3) Gears, 4) Springs, 5) Simple electrical circuits, and 6) Tools. The research data were analyzed using the RASCH Model Analysis using the WINSTEP application. The results showed no significant difference between mechanical engineering and civil engineering study programs in pulleys, springs, and electrical circuits. In the element of levers, gears and tools, the t count value is greater than the t table, so there is a significant difference between mechanical engineering and civil engineering study programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v4i3.2180
Primary Topic
Mechatronics Education and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Mechanical Reasoning of Engineering Students

Firdaus MS, Eddy Saud
Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran
Mechatronics Education and Applications
article

Differences in Mechanical Reasoning of Engineering Students

Firdaus MS, Eddy Saud
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences in engineering aptitude-mechanical reasoning among engineering students. This study is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional study design. This study was conducted at the Faculty of Engineering, Ogan Komering Ilir Islamic University, Kayuagung (UNISKI). The subjects of this study were selected by simple random sampling so that the number of samples obtained was 26 students of the mechanical engineering study program and 36 students of the civil engineering study program. The instrument used in this study was the aptitude-mechanical reasoning test developed by Mackellar (2015). This instrument consists of several topics, namely 1) Levers, 2) Pulleys, 3) Gears, 4) Springs, 5) Simple electrical circuits, and 6) Tools. The research data were analyzed using the RASCH Model Analysis using the WINSTEP application. The results showed no significant difference between mechanical engineering and civil engineering study programs in pulleys, springs, and electrical circuits. In the element of levers, gears and tools, the t count value is greater than the t table, so there is a significant difference between mechanical engineering and civil engineering study programs.

Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi PembelajaranVol. 4(3)
Universitas Islam Ogan Komering Ilir (ID)
Yale University
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Mechatronics Education and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differences in Mechanical Reasoning of Engineering Students — Firdaus MS, Eddy Saud · Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS