‘Le problème religieux’ van Malraux, geïllustreerd aan de hand van Rushdie, Spinoza en Galileo

The religious problem of Malraux, illustrated with Rushdie, Spinoza, and Galileo In this contribution three cases are discussed of thinkers who have come into conflict with the religious-fundamentalist ambition to control the freedom of thought and the freedom of expression of critical thinkers: Rushdie, Spinoza and Galileo. Salman Rushdie came into conflict with Islamic orthodoxy, Benedict Spinoza with Jewish orthodoxy and Galileo Galilei with Christian-Catholic orthodoxy. In addition to differences, interesting parallels can be drawn between these three situations. This article argues that it is good to study these parallels in order to learn something about how we should deal with religious fanaticism and upholding a culture of freedom, such as that in Article 18 (and 19 UDHR) as ideal.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tvrrb/187977842024015003004
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Le problème religieux’ van Malraux, geïllustreerd aan de hand van Rushdie, Spinoza en Galileo

P.B. Cliteur
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

‘Le problème religieux’ van Malraux, geïllustreerd aan de hand van Rushdie, Spinoza en Galileo

P.B. Cliteur
article en

Abstract

The religious problem of Malraux, illustrated with Rushdie, Spinoza, and Galileo In this contribution three cases are discussed of thinkers who have come into conflict with the religious-fundamentalist ambition to control the freedom of thought and the freedom of expression of critical thinkers: Rushdie, Spinoza and Galileo. Salman Rushdie came into conflict with Islamic orthodoxy, Benedict Spinoza with Jewish orthodoxy and Galileo Galilei with Christian-Catholic orthodoxy. In addition to differences, interesting parallels can be drawn between these three situations. This article argues that it is good to study these parallels in order to learn something about how we should deal with religious fanaticism and upholding a culture of freedom, such as that in Article 18 (and 19 UDHR) as ideal.

Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en BeleidVol. 15(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.