Rechterlijke toetsing van het kwalitatief en kwantitatief algemeen-belangcriterium bij religieuze anbi’s

Dutch judicial review of the qualitative and quantitative public interest criterion for religious common benefit institutions The author examines how Dutch case law interprets the public interest criterion for public benefit institutions of religious nature, both regarding the qualitative and quantitative aspect of this criterion. The qualitative aspect refers to aiming for public benefit and the quantitative aspect refers to aiming sufficiently for public benefit, i.e. at least ninety percent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tvrrb/187977842024015003003
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rechterlijke toetsing van het kwalitatief en kwantitatief algemeen-belangcriterium bij religieuze anbi’s

Mitra Tydeman-Yousef
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

Rechterlijke toetsing van het kwalitatief en kwantitatief algemeen-belangcriterium bij religieuze anbi’s

Mitra Tydeman-Yousef
article en

Abstract

Dutch judicial review of the qualitative and quantitative public interest criterion for religious common benefit institutions The author examines how Dutch case law interprets the public interest criterion for public benefit institutions of religious nature, both regarding the qualitative and quantitative aspect of this criterion. The qualitative aspect refers to aiming for public benefit and the quantitative aspect refers to aiming sufficiently for public benefit, i.e. at least ninety percent.

Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en BeleidVol. 15(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rechterlijke toetsing van het kwalitatief en kwantitatief algemeen-belangcriterium bij religieuze anbi’s — Mitra Tydeman-Yousef · Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS