Exploring the EU’s polyhedral peace mediation in Ethiopia and Sudan: Can the EU be a suitable peacemaker?

This paper examines EU engagement in peace mediation in sub-Saharan Africa, and specifically in Ethiopia’s Tigray war and the conflict in Sudan. It uses the analytical framework of “multi-mediation” to map, classify and analyse the mediation-related initiatives carried out by the EU. The ultimate goal is to defend the use of peace mediation as a cost-efficient and less coercive foreign policy tool, well-suited to safeguarding the EU’s peace and security interests in the African continent. The conclusion presents three main points: a) the EU is well-equipped to engage in mediation and be considered a “multi-mediator”; b) the EU has structural limitations which prevent it from fully mobilising these capacities and from leading mediation efforts; c) the EU is uniquely well-placed to leverage its resources and support mediation through a nuanced normative approach that can positively impact peace processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Documents CIDOB
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24241/doccidob.2025.16/en
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the EU’s polyhedral peace mediation in Ethiopia and Sudan: Can the EU be a suitable peacemaker?

Antoni Sastre Bel
Documents CIDOB
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Exploring the EU’s polyhedral peace mediation in Ethiopia and Sudan: Can the EU be a suitable peacemaker?

Antoni Sastre Bel
article en

Abstract

This paper examines EU engagement in peace mediation in sub-Saharan Africa, and specifically in Ethiopia’s Tigray war and the conflict in Sudan. It uses the analytical framework of “multi-mediation” to map, classify and analyse the mediation-related initiatives carried out by the EU. The ultimate goal is to defend the use of peace mediation as a cost-efficient and less coercive foreign policy tool, well-suited to safeguarding the EU’s peace and security interests in the African continent. The conclusion presents three main points: a) the EU is well-equipped to engage in mediation and be considered a “multi-mediator”; b) the EU has structural limitations which prevent it from fully mobilising these capacities and from leading mediation efforts; c) the EU is uniquely well-placed to leverage its resources and support mediation through a nuanced normative approach that can positively impact peace processes.

Documents CIDOB(16)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.