Digitally Mediated Research: WhatsApp Diaries in Times of Crisis and Beyond?

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown regulations implemented to curb its spread disrupted all facets of life. For many social scientists, it meant an inability to easily access research sites, creating a need for adaptation and resilience in data collection processes. One approach to answering these challenges has been the use of digital technologies for data collection. This paper critically reflects on the feasibility of digital research methods through the experiences of two research projects using digital diaries to understand community-based organisations. Together, the projects offer a longitudinal perspective on the use of digital diaries at the height of pandemic regulation and following from them. We conclude that, in the context of crises and an increasingly hybridised world, digital tools are an important alternative to traditional research methods; not necessarily replacing them but enhancing knowledge of social phenomena. However, the prevailing popularity of digital technologies for data collection, in the context of what we call a “convenience narrative,” has left thorough scholarly research compromised. As such, we outline best practices within a relatively new yet currently unstable methodological paradigm and argue for more research on the relationship between digital and traditional research methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Society and Development
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/17165
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitally Mediated Research: WhatsApp Diaries in Times of Crisis and Beyond?

Boitumelo Papane, Fiona Anciano
Journal of Law Society and Development
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Digitally Mediated Research: WhatsApp Diaries in Times of Crisis and Beyond?

Boitumelo Papane, Fiona Anciano
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown regulations implemented to curb its spread disrupted all facets of life. For many social scientists, it meant an inability to easily access research sites, creating a need for adaptation and resilience in data collection processes. One approach to answering these challenges has been the use of digital technologies for data collection. This paper critically reflects on the feasibility of digital research methods through the experiences of two research projects using digital diaries to understand community-based organisations. Together, the projects offer a longitudinal perspective on the use of digital diaries at the height of pandemic regulation and following from them. We conclude that, in the context of crises and an increasingly hybridised world, digital tools are an important alternative to traditional research methods; not necessarily replacing them but enhancing knowledge of social phenomena. However, the prevailing popularity of digital technologies for data collection, in the context of what we call a “convenience narrative,” has left thorough scholarly research compromised. As such, we outline best practices within a relatively new yet currently unstable methodological paradigm and argue for more research on the relationship between digital and traditional research methods.

Journal of Law Society and DevelopmentVol. 11
University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.