Does administrative monopoly affect enterprise innovation? An empirical analysis based on the perspective of factor mismatch in China

In the process of reforming from planned economy to market economy, the phenomenon of administrative monopoly has had a far-reaching impact on the development of China’s economy. Based on the perspective of factor mismatch, this paper examines the impact of administrative monopoly on enterprise innovation and its realization path, utilizing panel data from 30 Chinese provincial regions spanning 8 years from 2008 to 2015. The results of the study show that administrative monopoly significantly hinders the innovation activities of enterprises, showing a negative impact on both the output and input sides of innovation. By triggering factor mismatch, administrative monopoly has a hindering effect on enterprise innovation activities. Specifically, the intervention of administrative monopoly in the market leads to the mismatch of capital and labor factors in the market. When the interaction terms of administrative monopoly with capital mismatch and labor mismatch are added to the empirical model of administrative monopoly, it is found that the hindering effect of these interaction terms on enterprises is greatly enhanced. In the case of a single factor of capital mismatch and labor mismatch or the co-existence of both factors, their hindering effect on firms’ innovation is significantly enhanced. In addition, it is also found that capital mismatch has a more serious hindering effect on firm innovation than labor mismatch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241299653
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does administrative monopoly affect enterprise innovation? An empirical analysis based on the perspective of factor mismatch in China

Yanfei Wang, Liangchun Yu
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Does administrative monopoly affect enterprise innovation? An empirical analysis based on the perspective of factor mismatch in China

Yanfei Wang, Liangchun Yu
article en

Abstract

In the process of reforming from planned economy to market economy, the phenomenon of administrative monopoly has had a far-reaching impact on the development of China’s economy. Based on the perspective of factor mismatch, this paper examines the impact of administrative monopoly on enterprise innovation and its realization path, utilizing panel data from 30 Chinese provincial regions spanning 8 years from 2008 to 2015. The results of the study show that administrative monopoly significantly hinders the innovation activities of enterprises, showing a negative impact on both the output and input sides of innovation. By triggering factor mismatch, administrative monopoly has a hindering effect on enterprise innovation activities. Specifically, the intervention of administrative monopoly in the market leads to the mismatch of capital and labor factors in the market. When the interaction terms of administrative monopoly with capital mismatch and labor mismatch are added to the empirical model of administrative monopoly, it is found that the hindering effect of these interaction terms on enterprises is greatly enhanced. In the case of a single factor of capital mismatch and labor mismatch or the co-existence of both factors, their hindering effect on firms’ innovation is significantly enhanced. In addition, it is also found that capital mismatch has a more serious hindering effect on firm innovation than labor mismatch.

Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and EngineeringVol. 24(6)
Shandong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.