A Comparative Analysis of Human-Written vs. AI-Generated Prompts for Task Executions

This study examines the effectiveness of AI-generated prompts in task execution compared to human-written prompts. AI-generated prompts showed comparable performance to expert-crafted prompts and offered greater flexibility, making prompt engineering more accessible to users. Future work will explore more advanced prompt templates.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jaicc/2024(3)410
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Human-Written vs. AI-Generated Prompts for Task Executions

Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

A Comparative Analysis of Human-Written vs. AI-Generated Prompts for Task Executions

article en

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of AI-generated prompts in task execution compared to human-written prompts. AI-generated prompts showed comparable performance to expert-crafted prompts and offered greater flexibility, making prompt engineering more accessible to users. Future work will explore more advanced prompt templates.

Vol. 3(6)
Stamford Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Human-Written vs. AI-Generated Prompts for Task Executions · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS