IMAGE-BASED SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE REQUIREMENT OF MOTIVE UNDER THE FILMS AND PUBLICATIONS AMENDMENT ACT: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

Section 18F(1) of the Films and Publications Amendment Act (FAPAA) prohibits the commission of image-based sexual abuse (IBSA). This contribution critically assesses the requirement “with the intention of causing that individual harm” contained in section 18F(1)(b) of the FAPAA. It is demonstrated that the requirement “with the intention of causing that individual harm” cannot be understood as indicating intention in the legal sense (that is, dolus). Rather, section 18F(1)(b) refers to motive, or the reason for the perpetrator’s conduct. Section 18F(1)(b) should thus more accurately read (to avoid confusion with dolus) “with the ‘motive’ of causing that individual harm”. In the determination of criminal liability, motive has been repeatedly affirmed as irrelevant. The author supports this conclusion. In addition, the underlying reasons motivating the perpetration of IBSA vary substantially. Thus, requiring proof of motive in this respect is ill considered.However, motive is relevant to the process of sentencing. Some motives for the perpetration of IBSA may be considered by the sentencing court as “aggravating”, and, accordingly, attract a harsher sentence. Section 56A(2)(a) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act indicates several motives (for the commission of sexual offences) that might be considered “aggravating”. These include where a sexual offence is committed with the motive “to gain financially, or receive any favour, benefit, reward, compensation or any other advantage”. Many of these motives are witnessable in cases of IBSA, and being a sexual offence that should be located in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, should (in terms of section 56A(2)(a)) be considered “aggravating”. It is also shown that other aggravating motives listed in 56A(2)(a), such as to receive any “benefit” or “reward”, may apply when IBSA is committed for purposes of revenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obiter
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/m4hg4w41
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMAGE-BASED SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE REQUIREMENT OF MOTIVE UNDER THE FILMS AND PUBLICATIONS AMENDMENT ACT: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

Blake Martin
Obiter
Law in Society and Culture
article

IMAGE-BASED SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE REQUIREMENT OF MOTIVE UNDER THE FILMS AND PUBLICATIONS AMENDMENT ACT: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

Blake Martin
article en

Abstract

Section 18F(1) of the Films and Publications Amendment Act (FAPAA) prohibits the commission of image-based sexual abuse (IBSA). This contribution critically assesses the requirement “with the intention of causing that individual harm” contained in section 18F(1)(b) of the FAPAA. It is demonstrated that the requirement “with the intention of causing that individual harm” cannot be understood as indicating intention in the legal sense (that is, dolus). Rather, section 18F(1)(b) refers to motive, or the reason for the perpetrator’s conduct. Section 18F(1)(b) should thus more accurately read (to avoid confusion with dolus) “with the ‘motive’ of causing that individual harm”. In the determination of criminal liability, motive has been repeatedly affirmed as irrelevant. The author supports this conclusion. In addition, the underlying reasons motivating the perpetration of IBSA vary substantially. Thus, requiring proof of motive in this respect is ill considered.However, motive is relevant to the process of sentencing. Some motives for the perpetration of IBSA may be considered by the sentencing court as “aggravating”, and, accordingly, attract a harsher sentence. Section 56A(2)(a) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act indicates several motives (for the commission of sexual offences) that might be considered “aggravating”. These include where a sexual offence is committed with the motive “to gain financially, or receive any favour, benefit, reward, compensation or any other advantage”. Many of these motives are witnessable in cases of IBSA, and being a sexual offence that should be located in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, should (in terms of section 56A(2)(a)) be considered “aggravating”. It is also shown that other aggravating motives listed in 56A(2)(a), such as to receive any “benefit” or “reward”, may apply when IBSA is committed for purposes of revenge.

ObiterVol. 45(3)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IMAGE-BASED SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE REQUIREMENT OF MOTIVE UNDER THE FILMS AND PUBLICATIONS AMENDMENT ACT: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT — Blake Martin · Obiter (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS