Development of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT method: a hybrid model

This paper presents a study on the MCDM (multiple criteria decision making) hybridization methods. Three MCDM methods are used in the hybridization process: PSI (Preference Selection Index), RAPS (Ranking Alternatives by Perimeter Similarity), and MCRAT (Multiple Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace). PSI has long been known as an MCDM method, but it has an unexplored utility: the ability to self-calculate the weights for the criteria. Because of this, PSI is also known as an MCDM method that does not require users to calculate the weights for the criteria. RAPS and MCRAT are two MCDM methods that require users to calculate the weights for the criteria. The hybridization of PSI with RAPS and MCRAT aims to use the criteria weights calculated by the PSI method to serve the ranking of alternatives using the RAPS and MCRAT methods. This hybrid model of the three methods is named the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model. Thus, applying the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model to rank alternatives will generate three sets of ranking results: one from using PSI, one from using PSI-RAPS, and one from using PSI-MCRAT. The accuracy of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model was tested through a specific problem of ranking welding robot types. The number of welding robots to be ranked is seven, while the number of criteria to reflect each type of robot is six. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model. The lowest being between the PSI method and the PSI-RAPS method at 0.8214, and the highest being between the PSI-RAPS method and the PSI-MCRAT method at 0.9643. The results show that the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model has high accuracy. This study has provided a completely new and accurate method in the field of MCDM

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EUREKA Physics and Engineering
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2025.003404
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT method: a hybrid model

Tran Van Dua
2 citations
EUREKA Physics and Engineering
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.98
article

Development of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT method: a hybrid model

Tran Van Dua
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the MCDM (multiple criteria decision making) hybridization methods. Three MCDM methods are used in the hybridization process: PSI (Preference Selection Index), RAPS (Ranking Alternatives by Perimeter Similarity), and MCRAT (Multiple Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace). PSI has long been known as an MCDM method, but it has an unexplored utility: the ability to self-calculate the weights for the criteria. Because of this, PSI is also known as an MCDM method that does not require users to calculate the weights for the criteria. RAPS and MCRAT are two MCDM methods that require users to calculate the weights for the criteria. The hybridization of PSI with RAPS and MCRAT aims to use the criteria weights calculated by the PSI method to serve the ranking of alternatives using the RAPS and MCRAT methods. This hybrid model of the three methods is named the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model. Thus, applying the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model to rank alternatives will generate three sets of ranking results: one from using PSI, one from using PSI-RAPS, and one from using PSI-MCRAT. The accuracy of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model was tested through a specific problem of ranking welding robot types. The number of welding robots to be ranked is seven, while the number of criteria to reflect each type of robot is six. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model. The lowest being between the PSI method and the PSI-RAPS method at 0.8214, and the highest being between the PSI-RAPS method and the PSI-MCRAT method at 0.9643. The results show that the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT hybrid model has high accuracy. This study has provided a completely new and accurate method in the field of MCDM

EUREKA Physics and Engineering(1)
Hanoi University of Industry (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.