Evaluating Individual and Community-Based Utility Functions for Energy Demand Response

We analyze the behavior of an energy community of prosumers and consumers that participate in a demand response (DR) program under various conditions. First, we examine the effect of considering individual (one function per prosumer/consumer) and community (a single function modeling the entire community) utility functions. In both cases, we we evaluate the results considering quadratic as well as logarithmic utilities. Second, we explore the impact of using a double auction versus a constant pricing mechanism to set the energy prices, before implementing the DR program. Across all scenarios, our goal remains to maximize community welfare. The results from diverse study scenarios reveal that, when considering individual utilities, the double auction combined with quadratic utilities achieves maximum benefit, while logarithmic functions do not vary significantly with the pricing mechanisms. Moreover, the the community-based model is not reactive to both the utility function type and the pricing mechanism. Interestingly, this model achieves higher benefits compared to the individual model. However, demand profiles exhibit more pronounced peaks when there is generation surplus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/urucon63440.2024.10850436
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Individual and Community-Based Utility Functions for Energy Demand Response

Andrés Pantoja, Germán Obando, Katerine Guerrero
1 citations
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.21
article

Evaluating Individual and Community-Based Utility Functions for Energy Demand Response

Andrés Pantoja, Germán Obando, Katerine Guerrero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We analyze the behavior of an energy community of prosumers and consumers that participate in a demand response (DR) program under various conditions. First, we examine the effect of considering individual (one function per prosumer/consumer) and community (a single function modeling the entire community) utility functions. In both cases, we we evaluate the results considering quadratic as well as logarithmic utilities. Second, we explore the impact of using a double auction versus a constant pricing mechanism to set the energy prices, before implementing the DR program. Across all scenarios, our goal remains to maximize community welfare. The results from diverse study scenarios reveal that, when considering individual utilities, the double auction combined with quadratic utilities achieves maximum benefit, while logarithmic functions do not vary significantly with the pricing mechanisms. Moreover, the the community-based model is not reactive to both the utility function type and the pricing mechanism. Interestingly, this model achieves higher benefits compared to the individual model. However, demand profiles exhibit more pronounced peaks when there is generation surplus.

University of Nariño (CO)
BP
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.