Wind power forecast validation

Wind energy forecast validation is crucial for the reliable integration of renewable energy into the power grid. This study evaluates and compares the short-term wind power forecasts from two institutions: Administración Nacional de Usinas y Transmisiones Elóctricas (UTE) and Administración del Mercado Elóctrico (ADME). In collaboration with UdelaR-Fing, UTE has developed three models and also used forecasts provided by “Meteologica,” while ADME utilizes “Meteoblue” forecasts adjusted by a proprietary model. The model employs neural networks to refine wind speed predictions and then uses a sigmoid-like exponential function to convert these predictions into power forecasts. This compares the forecast accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Preliminary results indicate that for the year 2023 Meteologica’s forecasts have lower mean absolute error than ADME, suggesting a higher forecasting ability. It also shows that ADME has a more centered model while Meteorological tends to underestimate it. Future work will explore power percentiles over a more extended period and the impact of forecast initialization times on error metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/urucon63440.2024.10850097
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind power forecast validation

Matilde Ungerovich, Ruben Chaer, Santiago de Mello
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Wind power forecast validation

Matilde Ungerovich, Ruben Chaer, Santiago de Mello
article en

Abstract

Wind energy forecast validation is crucial for the reliable integration of renewable energy into the power grid. This study evaluates and compares the short-term wind power forecasts from two institutions: Administración Nacional de Usinas y Transmisiones Elóctricas (UTE) and Administración del Mercado Elóctrico (ADME). In collaboration with UdelaR-Fing, UTE has developed three models and also used forecasts provided by “Meteologica,” while ADME utilizes “Meteoblue” forecasts adjusted by a proprietary model. The model employs neural networks to refine wind speed predictions and then uses a sigmoid-like exponential function to convert these predictions into power forecasts. This compares the forecast accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Preliminary results indicate that for the year 2023 Meteologica’s forecasts have lower mean absolute error than ADME, suggesting a higher forecasting ability. It also shows that ADME has a more centered model while Meteorological tends to underestimate it. Future work will explore power percentiles over a more extended period and the impact of forecast initialization times on error metrics.

National Administration of Power Plants and Electrical Transmissions (Uruguay) (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.