Why green subsidies are preferred to carbon taxes: Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience

Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103129
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why green subsidies are preferred to carbon taxes: Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience

Frederick van der Ploeg
9 citations
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
28.18
article

Why green subsidies are preferred to carbon taxes: Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience

Frederick van der Ploeg
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.

Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementVol. 130
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Oxford (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
28.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.