Cycle conditions for “Luce rationality”

We extend and refine conditions for “Luce rationality” (i.e., the existence of a Luce – or logit – model) in the context of stochastic choice. When choice probabilities satisfy positivity , the cyclical independence (CI) condition of Ahumada and Ülkü (2018) and Echenique and Saito (2019) is necessary and sufficient for Luce rationality, even if choice is only observed for a restricted set of menus. We adapt results from the cycles approach (Rodrigues-Neto, 2009) to the common prior problem Harsanyi (1967-1968) to refine the CI condition, by reducing the number of cycle equations that need to be checked. A general algorithm is provided to identify a minimal sufficient set of equations. Three cases are discussed in detail: (i) when choice is only observed from binary menus, (ii) when all menus contain a common default; and (iii) when all menus contain an element from a common binary default set. Investigation of case (i) leads to a refinement of the famous product rule.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103094
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycle conditions for “Luce rationality”

Matthew Ryan, James Taylor, José A. Rodrigues‐Neto
2 citations
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
4.15
article

Cycle conditions for “Luce rationality”

Matthew Ryan, James Taylor, José A. Rodrigues‐Neto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We extend and refine conditions for “Luce rationality” (i.e., the existence of a Luce – or logit – model) in the context of stochastic choice. When choice probabilities satisfy positivity , the cyclical independence (CI) condition of Ahumada and Ülkü (2018) and Echenique and Saito (2019) is necessary and sufficient for Luce rationality, even if choice is only observed for a restricted set of menus. We adapt results from the cycles approach (Rodrigues-Neto, 2009) to the common prior problem Harsanyi (1967-1968) to refine the CI condition, by reducing the number of cycle equations that need to be checked. A general algorithm is provided to identify a minimal sufficient set of equations. Three cases are discussed in detail: (i) when choice is only observed from binary menus, (ii) when all menus contain a common default; and (iii) when all menus contain an element from a common binary default set. Investigation of case (i) leads to a refinement of the famous product rule.

Journal of Mathematical EconomicsVol. 117
Australian National University (AU), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cycle conditions for “Luce rationality” — Matthew Ryan, James Taylor, et al. · Journal of Mathematical Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS