A bibliographic study of biochar and hydrochar: Differences and similarities

Biomass conversion by thermochemical processes has gained increasing interest due to its carbon-neutral and/or carbon-negative effect. The most common thermochemical approach is pyrolysis, which results in the production of biochar, a well-known carbon-rich material with properties comparable to those of materials derived from fossil sources. In the last decade, hydrothermal carbonization of biomass has attracted attention due to its simple requirements, low cost and lower temperatures, producing a carbon-rich material called hydrochar. This bibliographical study, based on the Scopus database and focused on the last 5 years, without forgetting earlier articles, aims to define the main differences between the two processes and the physico-chemical properties of each char, to summarise the main techniques for their characterisation and to highlight the areas of application according to their properties. This review suggests that it would be strategic to distinguish between the terms hydrochar and biochar to ensure efficient characterisation and appropriate application. • This review article clarifies the difference between hydrochar and biochar. • Summarize the characterization methods applied to hydrochar and to biochar. • Co-occurrence in a total 1902 references indicated the most convenient applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2025.106985
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bibliographic study of biochar and hydrochar: Differences and similarities

Mario Berrettoni, Cristina Leonelli, Paolo Cognigni
14 citations
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
9.44
article

A bibliographic study of biochar and hydrochar: Differences and similarities

Mario Berrettoni, Cristina Leonelli, Paolo Cognigni
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Biomass conversion by thermochemical processes has gained increasing interest due to its carbon-neutral and/or carbon-negative effect. The most common thermochemical approach is pyrolysis, which results in the production of biochar, a well-known carbon-rich material with properties comparable to those of materials derived from fossil sources. In the last decade, hydrothermal carbonization of biomass has attracted attention due to its simple requirements, low cost and lower temperatures, producing a carbon-rich material called hydrochar. This bibliographical study, based on the Scopus database and focused on the last 5 years, without forgetting earlier articles, aims to define the main differences between the two processes and the physico-chemical properties of each char, to summarise the main techniques for their characterisation and to highlight the areas of application according to their properties. This review suggests that it would be strategic to distinguish between the terms hydrochar and biochar to ensure efficient characterisation and appropriate application. • This review article clarifies the difference between hydrochar and biochar. • Summarize the characterization methods applied to hydrochar and to biochar. • Co-occurrence in a total 1902 references indicated the most convenient applications.

Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisVol. 187
Università di Camerino (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
9.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.