The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals

Abstract In a paper published in 2020, Philip McCann gives a qualitative overview of “the Nordic contribution to regional science”, which, however, only includes contributions by Swedish regional science researchers. The purpose of this paper is to complement McCann’s overview by highlighting Nordic contributions to regional science in the period 1983–2022 through a bibliometric analysis of publications in a set of thirteen regional science journals indexed in Web of Science, using several standard bibliometric tools. Our most interesting and surprising result is that the number of “Nordic” publications in the chosen set of journals has grown more than six times faster than the total number of publications in these journals between 1983–1992 and 2013–2022. This implies that the “Nordic” regional science researchers have increased their “market share” from 1.9 to 9.1 per cent. During the same period, the share of co-authored papers increased from 50.0 to 82.9 per cent and the share of international co-authorships increased from 0 to 50.0 per cent and went from being a mainly intra-European activity to a global activity. This process is also reflected in a certain international influence on the research topics during the four periods analysed, but to a considerable extent it seems that the Nordic regional scientists have pursued their own Nordic research themes. In terms of individual research productivity, there was the expected skewed distribution with a small number of researchers with a large research output. At the institutional level, there were notable changes in the ranking of institutions in terms of number of authorships, but one institution—Umeå University—ranked among the Nordic top-2 in all four periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Regional Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-024-01346-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals

Charlie Karlsson, Björn Hammarsssfelt
1 citations
The Annals of Regional Science
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
article

The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals

Charlie Karlsson, Björn Hammarsssfelt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In a paper published in 2020, Philip McCann gives a qualitative overview of “the Nordic contribution to regional science”, which, however, only includes contributions by Swedish regional science researchers. The purpose of this paper is to complement McCann’s overview by highlighting Nordic contributions to regional science in the period 1983–2022 through a bibliometric analysis of publications in a set of thirteen regional science journals indexed in Web of Science, using several standard bibliometric tools. Our most interesting and surprising result is that the number of “Nordic” publications in the chosen set of journals has grown more than six times faster than the total number of publications in these journals between 1983–1992 and 2013–2022. This implies that the “Nordic” regional science researchers have increased their “market share” from 1.9 to 9.1 per cent. During the same period, the share of co-authored papers increased from 50.0 to 82.9 per cent and the share of international co-authorships increased from 0 to 50.0 per cent and went from being a mainly intra-European activity to a global activity. This process is also reflected in a certain international influence on the research topics during the four periods analysed, but to a considerable extent it seems that the Nordic regional scientists have pursued their own Nordic research themes. In terms of individual research productivity, there was the expected skewed distribution with a small number of researchers with a large research output. At the institutional level, there were notable changes in the ranking of institutions in terms of number of authorships, but one institution—Umeå University—ranked among the Nordic top-2 in all four periods.

The Annals of Regional ScienceVol. 74(1)
Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE), Jönköping University (SE), University of Borås (SE)
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.