A stakeholder analysis based on project managers’ perceptions: Unlocking transformative potential in Natura 2000 projects

Divergent values and interests among stakeholders lead to conflicts during the implementation of biodiversity projects. The present study reveals the perception of project managers about stakeholders’ needs, interests, positions, attitudes, and power that ultimately shape the relationships between these actors within Natura 2000 projects in Romania. Analyzing three selected projects, the research explores the existence of transformative change premises in terms of integrative, capability-responsiveness, and power equilibrium features. The thematic analysis of the interviews revealed a conflict network between stakeholders that poses a threat to the integrative attribute. “Academia” was found to be capable of fulfilling a mediator role, emphasizing the need for neutral entities in conflict resolution. Stakeholders segregate based on interests – those prioritizing economic functions show less concern for biodiversity. The need to use inclusive language in Natura 2000 projects was pointed out to prevent power imbalances and enhance overall inclusiveness. The study advocates for a project-specific approach to stakeholder analysis, thus avoiding the one-size-fits-all model. • The potential for transformative change in Natura 2000 projects was explored. • A stakeholder analysis based on project managers’ perceptions was performed. • Capability-responsiveness, power equilibrium, and integrative attributes were analyzed. • Power asymmetry can fuel conflicts between farmers and public authorities. • It was concluded that Academia stands as a mediator in conflict resolution.