National climate strategies show inequalities in global development of carbon dioxide geological storage

Abstract Carbon dioxide geological storage (CGS) is considered critical for limiting global average temperature rise to below 1.5 °C by mitigating fossil industrial emissions and delivering permanent Carbon Dioxide Removals. Here we examine the role of CGS in long-term national emission reduction strategies submitted to the UNFCCC under the Paris Agreement. We find that a third of countries plan to develop CGS for emissions mitigation only, and a third for both emissions mitigation and carbon removals, but no countries plan on CGS for carbon removals alone. Neither the presence or performance of CGS maturity assessments correspond to CGS plans. Climate strategies of high income countries with high historic oil and gas production show firmest commitment to CGS. These countries already have multiple advantages for implementing and benefiting from CGS, which raises inequalities and sensitivities that must be carefully considered when designing carbon market and climate finance policies and frameworks for CGS development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02043-4
Citations
6
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National climate strategies show inequalities in global development of carbon dioxide geological storage

Jennifer J. Roberts, Gareth Johnson, Juan Alcalde
6 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.79
article

National climate strategies show inequalities in global development of carbon dioxide geological storage

Jennifer J. Roberts, Gareth Johnson, Juan Alcalde
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carbon dioxide geological storage (CGS) is considered critical for limiting global average temperature rise to below 1.5 °C by mitigating fossil industrial emissions and delivering permanent Carbon Dioxide Removals. Here we examine the role of CGS in long-term national emission reduction strategies submitted to the UNFCCC under the Paris Agreement. We find that a third of countries plan to develop CGS for emissions mitigation only, and a third for both emissions mitigation and carbon removals, but no countries plan on CGS for carbon removals alone. Neither the presence or performance of CGS maturity assessments correspond to CGS plans. Climate strategies of high income countries with high historic oil and gas production show firmest commitment to CGS. These countries already have multiple advantages for implementing and benefiting from CGS, which raises inequalities and sensitivities that must be carefully considered when designing carbon market and climate finance policies and frameworks for CGS development.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
University of Strathclyde (GB), Geociencias Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.