REHABILITATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE THROUGH GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE AND XENOGRAFTS: CBCT STUDY

The aim of the study was to assess the bone gain achieved through guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques using bovine-origin xenograft versus porcine-origin xenograft combined with autogenous bone. Materials and method. The study was conducted on 62 patients (28 male; 34 female), aged between 40-79 years. All patients had partial edentulousness and were candidates for dental implants and the rehabilitation of the resorbed alveolar bone through guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques. The characteristics of the study groups are presented in Tables 1.1-1.2. Based on the type of graft material used, the patients were divided into two study groups: bovine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (30 patients; 41 implant sites); porcine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (32 patients; 50 implant sites). The CBCT examination (Sirona Orthophos XG) was used to measure alveolar bone parameters (preoperatively and six months postoperatively): height, width, and osteodensity of the alveolar bone at the implant sites. Results. The average vertical bone gain (height) was lower in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.3076 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.8736 mm). The average horizontal bone gain (width) was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.4273 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.1624 mm). The osteodensity gain was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (279.59 HU) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (254.24 HU). Conclusions. Post-operative bone gain in vertical and horizontal dimensions, as well as osteodensity, were statistically significant both in the overall group and for each of the investigated categories (sex, age group, location). The use of guided bone regeneration technique using combination of xenografts with autogenous bone are effective in the reconstruction of alveolar bone.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62610/rjor.2024.3.16.11
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REHABILITATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE THROUGH GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE AND XENOGRAFTS: CBCT STUDY

Marcel Costuleanu, Doriana Agop Forna, Andreea Tibeică, Norina Consuela Forna et al.
Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

REHABILITATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE THROUGH GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE AND XENOGRAFTS: CBCT STUDY

Marcel Costuleanu, Doriana Agop Forna, Andreea Tibeică, Norina Consuela Forna, Silviu Cătălin Tibeică
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the bone gain achieved through guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques using bovine-origin xenograft versus porcine-origin xenograft combined with autogenous bone. Materials and method. The study was conducted on 62 patients (28 male; 34 female), aged between 40-79 years. All patients had partial edentulousness and were candidates for dental implants and the rehabilitation of the resorbed alveolar bone through guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques. The characteristics of the study groups are presented in Tables 1.1-1.2. Based on the type of graft material used, the patients were divided into two study groups: bovine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (30 patients; 41 implant sites); porcine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (32 patients; 50 implant sites). The CBCT examination (Sirona Orthophos XG) was used to measure alveolar bone parameters (preoperatively and six months postoperatively): height, width, and osteodensity of the alveolar bone at the implant sites. Results. The average vertical bone gain (height) was lower in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.3076 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.8736 mm). The average horizontal bone gain (width) was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.4273 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.1624 mm). The osteodensity gain was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (279.59 HU) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (254.24 HU). Conclusions. Post-operative bone gain in vertical and horizontal dimensions, as well as osteodensity, were statistically significant both in the overall group and for each of the investigated categories (sex, age group, location). The use of guided bone regeneration technique using combination of xenografts with autogenous bone are effective in the reconstruction of alveolar bone.

Romanian Journal of Oral RehabilitationVol. 16(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.