Artificial intelligence, recessionary pressures and population health

Economic and labour policies have a considerable influence on health and well-being through direct financial impacts, and by shaping social and physical environments. Strong economies are important for public health investment and employment, yet the rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to reshape economies, presenting challenges beyond mere temporary market disruption. Generative AI can perform non-routine cognitive tasks, previously unattainable though traditional automation, creating new efficiencies. While this technology offers opportunities for innovation and productivity, its labour-displacing potential raises serious concerns about economic stability and social equity, both of which are critical to health. Job displacement driven by generative AI could worsen income inequality, shrink middle-class opportunities and reduce consumer demand, triggering recessionary pressures. In this article, we propose the existence of an AI-capital-to-labour ratio threshold beyond which a self-reinforcing cycle of recessionary pressures may emerge, and which market forces alone cannot correct. Traditional responses to such pressures, like fiscal stimulus or monetary easing, may be ineffective in addressing structural disruptions to labour markets caused by generative AI. We call for a proactive global response to harness the benefits of generative AI while mitigating risks. This response should focus on reorienting economic systems towards collective well-being, as emphasized in the World Health Assembly resolution <i>Economics of health for all</i> and the United Nations' Global Digital Compact. Integrated strategies that combine fiscal policy, regulation and social policies are critical to ensuring generative AI advances societal health and equity while avoiding harm from excessive job displacement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.24.291950
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence, recessionary pressures and population health

Yun Ju Christine Song, Harris A. Eyre, William Hynes, Roy Green et al.
6 citations
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Employment and Welfare Studies
16.89
article

Artificial intelligence, recessionary pressures and population health

Yun Ju Christine Song, Harris A. Eyre, William Hynes, Roy Green, Mark Heffernan, Jo‐An Occhipinti, Ante Prodan, Ian Bernard Hickie, Goran Ujdur, John Buchanan, Adam Skinner, Marcel Tanner, Sharan Burrow
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Economic and labour policies have a considerable influence on health and well-being through direct financial impacts, and by shaping social and physical environments. Strong economies are important for public health investment and employment, yet the rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to reshape economies, presenting challenges beyond mere temporary market disruption. Generative AI can perform non-routine cognitive tasks, previously unattainable though traditional automation, creating new efficiencies. While this technology offers opportunities for innovation and productivity, its labour-displacing potential raises serious concerns about economic stability and social equity, both of which are critical to health. Job displacement driven by generative AI could worsen income inequality, shrink middle-class opportunities and reduce consumer demand, triggering recessionary pressures. In this article, we propose the existence of an AI-capital-to-labour ratio threshold beyond which a self-reinforcing cycle of recessionary pressures may emerge, and which market forces alone cannot correct. Traditional responses to such pressures, like fiscal stimulus or monetary easing, may be ineffective in addressing structural disruptions to labour markets caused by generative AI. We call for a proactive global response to harness the benefits of generative AI while mitigating risks. This response should focus on reorienting economic systems towards collective well-being, as emphasized in the World Health Assembly resolution <i>Economics of health for all</i> and the United Nations' Global Digital Compact. Integrated strategies that combine fiscal policy, regulation and social policies are critical to ensuring generative AI advances societal health and equity while avoiding harm from excessive job displacement.

Bulletin of the World Health OrganizationVol. 103(02)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Banque de France (FR), Grantham and District Hospital (GB), Grantham College (GB), Swiss Academy of Sciences (CH), Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Western Sydney University (AU), Rice University (US)
Universität Basel, Santa Fe Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Employment and Welfare Studies
16.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.