The Unbearable Opportunity Costs of the Political Science PhD: Evidence and Lessons from Canada

Abstract Limited academic career prospects are pushing PhD graduates in political science and other disciplines to nonacademic careers. Understanding the mismatch between student and supervisor perceptions of doctoral career training is a starting point for suggesting program reforms. This research note examines the perceptions of PhD students and supervisors on doctoral career training. We compare results from two surveys of English-speaking Canadian universities on doctoral political science programs; one surveys PhD students and the other surveys supervisors. These survey results suggest that 1) students are more aware of the limited academic job market and interested in nonacademic careers than supervisors realize; 2) supervisors are unaware of the sunk costs PhD students face; 3) supervisors and students have different preferences for change in doctoral programs; and 4) students overestimate supervisors’ confidence in preparing them for nonacademic careers. Changes in program design can better meet student needs in these PhD programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423924000441
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unbearable Opportunity Costs of the Political Science PhD: Evidence and Lessons from Canada

Loleen Berdahl, Jonathan Malloy, Lisa Young, Bianca Jamal
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
0.85
article

The Unbearable Opportunity Costs of the Political Science PhD: Evidence and Lessons from Canada

Loleen Berdahl, Jonathan Malloy, Lisa Young, Bianca Jamal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Limited academic career prospects are pushing PhD graduates in political science and other disciplines to nonacademic careers. Understanding the mismatch between student and supervisor perceptions of doctoral career training is a starting point for suggesting program reforms. This research note examines the perceptions of PhD students and supervisors on doctoral career training. We compare results from two surveys of English-speaking Canadian universities on doctoral political science programs; one surveys PhD students and the other surveys supervisors. These survey results suggest that 1) students are more aware of the limited academic job market and interested in nonacademic careers than supervisors realize; 2) supervisors are unaware of the sunk costs PhD students face; 3) supervisors and students have different preferences for change in doctoral programs; and 4) students overestimate supervisors’ confidence in preparing them for nonacademic careers. Changes in program design can better meet student needs in these PhD programs.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 57(4)
University of Calgary (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.