Exploring The Use of Advanced Machine Learning to Detect Fraudulent Crypto Platforms

The decentralized nature, self-regulation, and rapid transaction speeds of the cryptocurrency landscape foster both innovation and fraud. As crypto gains attention, fraudulent exchanges posing as legitimate platforms present significant financial risks. Traditional reporting methods, like those of CryptoScamDB, are becoming less effective. This study addresses the need for automated techniques to identify and classify fraudulent exchanges. We found that features related to domain information, website security, and user reviews are crucial for detection. A comparative experiment using machine learning models—random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbour, light gradient boosting machine, and multi-layer perceptron—showed that the light gradient boosting machine (95.9%) and random forest (95.5%) had the highest accuracy. An ensemble model using soft voting achieved a higher accuracy of 96.2%, outperforming its base models. These results demonstrate that machine learning is a viable approach for automating the classification of fraudulent exchanges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icast61769.2024.10856435
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring The Use of Advanced Machine Learning to Detect Fraudulent Crypto Platforms

Govindha Ramaiah Yeluripati, John Terence Manful, Adelle Hasford
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Exploring The Use of Advanced Machine Learning to Detect Fraudulent Crypto Platforms

Govindha Ramaiah Yeluripati, John Terence Manful, Adelle Hasford
article en

Abstract

The decentralized nature, self-regulation, and rapid transaction speeds of the cryptocurrency landscape foster both innovation and fraud. As crypto gains attention, fraudulent exchanges posing as legitimate platforms present significant financial risks. Traditional reporting methods, like those of CryptoScamDB, are becoming less effective. This study addresses the need for automated techniques to identify and classify fraudulent exchanges. We found that features related to domain information, website security, and user reviews are crucial for detection. A comparative experiment using machine learning models—random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbour, light gradient boosting machine, and multi-layer perceptron—showed that the light gradient boosting machine (95.9%) and random forest (95.5%) had the highest accuracy. An ensemble model using soft voting achieved a higher accuracy of 96.2%, outperforming its base models. These results demonstrate that machine learning is a viable approach for automating the classification of fraudulent exchanges.

Ashesi University (GH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.