Assessment of Reporting Quality in Orthodontic Systematic Reviews: An Observational Study
The reporting quality of orthodontic systematic reviews varied, highlighting the need for improvement in areas such as reporting meta-analysis methods and addressing reporting bias. Adherence to the PRISMA guidelines should be emphasized to enhance transparency and strengthen the credibility of orthodontic systematic reviews, supporting evidence-based decision-making in orthodontic practice.
Authors
- Fahad Alharbi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-1528)
- Rawda Omar Alghabban
Institutions
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_556_24
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00