Unpacking power dynamics in participatory communication among agricultural sector stakeholders

This article explores power dynamics within participatory communication process among stakeholders in the agricultural sector of northwest Ethiopia. This study underpinning the article used qualitative data collected from key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and observations. Concepts from participatory development communication theory, the theory of communicative action, and power typology were used as analytical frameworks. The article underscores how political elites, structural hierarchies, experts, and cultural influence dominate participatory communication platforms, marginalising the voices of smallholder farmers and other stakeholders. These actors not only dominate discussions, but also shape decisions, as their ideas were taken for granted uncritically. This dominance mirrors existing broader political and cultural power structures, which marginalise smallholder farmers and other less powerful stakeholders, limiting inclusivity in decision-making. The findings underscore the need for equitable power redistribution to foster more equitable and inclusive decision -making in participatory platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Development
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251314853
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking power dynamics in participatory communication among agricultural sector stakeholders

Anteneh Mekuria Tesfaye, Siyasanga M. Tyali
1 citations
Information Development
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
article

Unpacking power dynamics in participatory communication among agricultural sector stakeholders

Anteneh Mekuria Tesfaye, Siyasanga M. Tyali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores power dynamics within participatory communication process among stakeholders in the agricultural sector of northwest Ethiopia. This study underpinning the article used qualitative data collected from key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and observations. Concepts from participatory development communication theory, the theory of communicative action, and power typology were used as analytical frameworks. The article underscores how political elites, structural hierarchies, experts, and cultural influence dominate participatory communication platforms, marginalising the voices of smallholder farmers and other stakeholders. These actors not only dominate discussions, but also shape decisions, as their ideas were taken for granted uncritically. This dominance mirrors existing broader political and cultural power structures, which marginalise smallholder farmers and other less powerful stakeholders, limiting inclusivity in decision-making. The findings underscore the need for equitable power redistribution to foster more equitable and inclusive decision -making in participatory platforms.

Information Development
University of South Africa (ZA)
Bahir Dar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.