Randomized Control Trial: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy

Background: Advancements in colorectal surgery have introduced laparoscopic techniques as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open surgery for right hemicolectomy. While laparoscopic surgery offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmetic outcomes, it remains technically demanding, particularly for advanced malignancies. This study compares the short -term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy. Aim: To evaluate and compare laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy in terms of operative time, oncological clearance, cosmetic outcomes, hospital stay, early complications, and short -term recurrence. Methods: A prospective randomized control trial was conducted at S. P. Medical College and P. B. M. Hospital, Bikaner, over 19 months. A total of 46 patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (laparoscopic, 23 patients) and Group B (open surgery, 23 patients). Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentations, operative metrics, and postoperative outcomes. Standardized protocols were followed, and patients were monitored for 30 -day complications and short -term recurrence. Results: Laparoscopic surgery demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays (7.69 vs.13.35 days, p=0.0001), reduced blood loss (106.25 vs.369.13 ml, p=0.0001), shorter incision lengths (7.13 vs.15.65 cm, p=0.0001), and fewer complications (0% vs.34.78% wound infections, p=0.0001). However, laparoscopic procedures required longer operative times (210 vs.152.61 minutes, p=0.0001). Oncological clearance, including lymph nodes harvested, was comparable between groups. Advanced -stage tumors (T4) were managed exclusively via open surgery due to technical challenges with laparoscopic techniques. Conclusion: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy offers substantial benefits over open surgery, including faster recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and fewer complications, making it a preferable choice for benign conditions and early -stage malignancies. Open surgery remains crucial for advanced malignancies and cases requiring conversion. Enhanced surgical expertise and advanced equipment are essential for optimizing laparoscopic outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr25127204418
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized Control Trial: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy

Ramesh Agarwal, R. K. Kajla, Mahavir Prasad, Dinesh Kumar Bhamu et al.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Randomized Control Trial: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy

Ramesh Agarwal, R. K. Kajla, Mahavir Prasad, Dinesh Kumar Bhamu, Yogesh Sadh, Surendra Kumar Jat
article en

Abstract

Background: Advancements in colorectal surgery have introduced laparoscopic techniques as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open surgery for right hemicolectomy. While laparoscopic surgery offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmetic outcomes, it remains technically demanding, particularly for advanced malignancies. This study compares the short -term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy. Aim: To evaluate and compare laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy in terms of operative time, oncological clearance, cosmetic outcomes, hospital stay, early complications, and short -term recurrence. Methods: A prospective randomized control trial was conducted at S. P. Medical College and P. B. M. Hospital, Bikaner, over 19 months. A total of 46 patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (laparoscopic, 23 patients) and Group B (open surgery, 23 patients). Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentations, operative metrics, and postoperative outcomes. Standardized protocols were followed, and patients were monitored for 30 -day complications and short -term recurrence. Results: Laparoscopic surgery demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays (7.69 vs.13.35 days, p=0.0001), reduced blood loss (106.25 vs.369.13 ml, p=0.0001), shorter incision lengths (7.13 vs.15.65 cm, p=0.0001), and fewer complications (0% vs.34.78% wound infections, p=0.0001). However, laparoscopic procedures required longer operative times (210 vs.152.61 minutes, p=0.0001). Oncological clearance, including lymph nodes harvested, was comparable between groups. Advanced -stage tumors (T4) were managed exclusively via open surgery due to technical challenges with laparoscopic techniques. Conclusion: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy offers substantial benefits over open surgery, including faster recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and fewer complications, making it a preferable choice for benign conditions and early -stage malignancies. Open surgery remains crucial for advanced malignancies and cases requiring conversion. Enhanced surgical expertise and advanced equipment are essential for optimizing laparoscopic outcomes.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.