Flexing Armageddon: Displacing Climate Change Anxiety through Soft Power Nationalist Interests in Guo Fan’s The Wandering Earth (2019)

Abstract In recent years, apparently as part of the public relations for its global “soft power” initiatives, China has moderately relaxed much of its previously archaic policy control of its cinema production industry. One result has been the release of a spate of Chinese films to international streaming platforms such as Netflix. One highly visible example is Guo Fan’s The Wandering Earth (2019), a pre-pandemic apocalypse film that unabashedly appropriates conventions from the raft of fin-de-millenaire Hollywood apocalypse films such as Michael Bay’s Armageddon (1998) as part of China’s political economy bid to enter into the international cinematic market. But is it as simple as all that? While films such as The Wandering Earth represent a welcome diversification of more international fare on such giant media streaming platforms as Netflix, and give international exposure to such talented Chinese directors as Guo Fan, the particular ideological project of the film should not go unnoticed. While critics such as Petrus Liu (2020), Laura Waisbich (2020), Ping Zhu (2020), and Amir Khan (2020) have noted the film as an allegory of catastrophic climate change, and Petrus Liu (2020) and Jeroen de Kloet (2022) have noted its similarity to Armageddon in particular, the specific ideological projects of the displacement of techno-industrial responsibility for catastrophic climate change in concert with a “soft power” competition with U.S. hegemony in the context of what Chris Berry (2021) refers to as the phenomenon of “two globalizations” has not been clearly articulated. When compared against Armageddon in particular, it becomes clear how the film works to displace climate change responsibilities in a soft power ideological gambit against U.S. global-capitalist hegemony. Thus, the project of this article is to explore how The Wandering Earth narratively raises the stakes on a similar American ideological project in such spectacular Hollywood films as Michael Bay’s Armageddon , in particular, for example, and resolves contemporary issues of eco-catastrophe with a melodramatic tale of xenophobic Chinese patriarchal salvation that supersedes the American originals in a “soft power” gambit for global hegemony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Youth and Globalization
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-bja10033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexing Armageddon: Displacing Climate Change Anxiety through Soft Power Nationalist Interests in Guo Fan’s The Wandering Earth (2019)

David Christopher
1 citations
Youth and Globalization
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
15.18
article

Flexing Armageddon: Displacing Climate Change Anxiety through Soft Power Nationalist Interests in Guo Fan’s The Wandering Earth (2019)

David Christopher
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, apparently as part of the public relations for its global “soft power” initiatives, China has moderately relaxed much of its previously archaic policy control of its cinema production industry. One result has been the release of a spate of Chinese films to international streaming platforms such as Netflix. One highly visible example is Guo Fan’s The Wandering Earth (2019), a pre-pandemic apocalypse film that unabashedly appropriates conventions from the raft of fin-de-millenaire Hollywood apocalypse films such as Michael Bay’s Armageddon (1998) as part of China’s political economy bid to enter into the international cinematic market. But is it as simple as all that? While films such as The Wandering Earth represent a welcome diversification of more international fare on such giant media streaming platforms as Netflix, and give international exposure to such talented Chinese directors as Guo Fan, the particular ideological project of the film should not go unnoticed. While critics such as Petrus Liu (2020), Laura Waisbich (2020), Ping Zhu (2020), and Amir Khan (2020) have noted the film as an allegory of catastrophic climate change, and Petrus Liu (2020) and Jeroen de Kloet (2022) have noted its similarity to Armageddon in particular, the specific ideological projects of the displacement of techno-industrial responsibility for catastrophic climate change in concert with a “soft power” competition with U.S. hegemony in the context of what Chris Berry (2021) refers to as the phenomenon of “two globalizations” has not been clearly articulated. When compared against Armageddon in particular, it becomes clear how the film works to displace climate change responsibilities in a soft power ideological gambit against U.S. global-capitalist hegemony. Thus, the project of this article is to explore how The Wandering Earth narratively raises the stakes on a similar American ideological project in such spectacular Hollywood films as Michael Bay’s Armageddon , in particular, for example, and resolves contemporary issues of eco-catastrophe with a melodramatic tale of xenophobic Chinese patriarchal salvation that supersedes the American originals in a “soft power” gambit for global hegemony.

Youth and GlobalizationVol. 6(1-2)
University of Leicester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.